2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and inter-comparison of models for landslide tsunami generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, we do not take into account material heterogeneity, segregation and fragmentation processes, bed erosion and incorporation of air and/or water, or density variations that can be caused by the expansion or contraction of the material and their impact on pore fluid pressure [see Delannay et al, 2017 for a review of processes]. HySEA was developed by the EDANYA group [Asunción-Hernández et al, 2012, Asunción et al, 2013, Castro Díaz et al, 2005, 2006, 2008a,b, Macías et al, 2015 and has been successfully used to simulate tsunamis generated by landslides [Kirby et al, 2022 (for a benchmarking exercise); Macías et al, 2021, Esposti Ongaro et al, 2021. From the depth-averaged equations, six unknowns are solved by the model, (h 1 , u 1x , u 1y ) and (h 2 , u 2x , u 2y ), representing the vertical height and horizontal velocity of the fluid (index 1) and granular layer (index 2), respectively, averaged in the vertical direction.…”
Section: Hyseamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, we do not take into account material heterogeneity, segregation and fragmentation processes, bed erosion and incorporation of air and/or water, or density variations that can be caused by the expansion or contraction of the material and their impact on pore fluid pressure [see Delannay et al, 2017 for a review of processes]. HySEA was developed by the EDANYA group [Asunción-Hernández et al, 2012, Asunción et al, 2013, Castro Díaz et al, 2005, 2006, 2008a,b, Macías et al, 2015 and has been successfully used to simulate tsunamis generated by landslides [Kirby et al, 2022 (for a benchmarking exercise); Macías et al, 2021, Esposti Ongaro et al, 2021. From the depth-averaged equations, six unknowns are solved by the model, (h 1 , u 1x , u 1y ) and (h 2 , u 2x , u 2y ), representing the vertical height and horizontal velocity of the fluid (index 1) and granular layer (index 2), respectively, averaged in the vertical direction.…”
Section: Hyseamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirby et al, 2013, Popinet, 2015, Zhou et al, 2011 are available. In particular, these non-hydrostatic models are necessary at least to accurately simulate tsunami wavelengths of about the same order of magnitude as the wa-ter depth [Gylfadóttir et al, 2017, Kirby et al, 2022Yavari-Ramshe and Ataie-Ashtiani, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the interest on landslide tsunamis has been boosted through a series of works providing new insights on their peculiar characteristics (Heller et al 2016;Evers et al 2019;Heidarzadeh et al 2020;Løvholt et al 2020;Snelling et al 2020;Ruffini et al 2021;Iorio et al 2021). Comprehensive reviews of the approaches adopted for simulating landslide motion and water interactions, as well as available numerical techniques, can be found in Heidarzadeh et al (2014), Yavari-Ramshe and Ataie-Ashtiani (2016), and in Kirby et al (2022) which compares different codes applied to benchmarks with real case.…”
Section: Original Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslide-generated tsunamis have been benchmarked. At the laboratory scale, benchmarking mainly focused on comparison between simulated and recorded water waves on gauges (Kirby et al 2022). Indeed, experimental data rarely provide both the detailed time evolution of the granular mass and the water waves.…”
Section: E X P E R I M E N Ta L Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, wave dispersion can be significant (Glimsdal et al 2013;Ma et al 2015) when the water wavelength is smaller than or about the same order of magnitude as the water depth (Yavari-Ramshe & Ataie-Ashtiani 2016). For more than two decades, more advanced depth-averaged models to describe water wave propagation have been developed based on Boussinesq-type equations (non-hydrostatic pressure), that are weakly or fully dispersive (Kirby et al 1998;Zhou et al 2011;Shi et al 2012;Popinet 2015;Kirby et al 2022), as is the case for the HySEA model (Macias et al 2021b). Such depth-averaged non-hydrostatic models are also valid only for a sufficiently small ratio of the water depth to the tsunami wavelength, a limitation inadequately discussed in the literature (Macias et al 2021a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%