1999
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a questionnaire for assessing physical work load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For missing data in multi-item measures, case mean substitution was used for respondents who answered at least 75% of the items of a scale. Missing data for physical workload index were not replaced because the index is calculated by a formula with different weights for each item (Hollmann et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For missing data in multi-item measures, case mean substitution was used for respondents who answered at least 75% of the items of a scale. Missing data for physical workload index were not replaced because the index is calculated by a formula with different weights for each item (Hollmann et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace and employment factors included type of hospital, work setting, type of unit, years worked in nursing, work status, work schedule, work hours per day, and availability of lift team. Physical workload was assessed by the number of patient lifts or transfers per shift and the modified Physical Workload Index Questionnaire (Hollmann et al, 1999;Janowitz et al, 2006). The Physical Workload Index Questionnaire included 19 items asking about the average frequency of body postures and lifting, pushing, pulling, or carrying of loads during a work day with a 5-point response scale, ranging from never to very often.…”
Section: Study Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPAQ has acceptable measurement properties (Hagstromer et al, 2006) and assesses frequency and duration of physical activity in five different domains (i.e., occupation, transportation, domestic work, recreation, sedentary activity; Hagstromer et al, 2006). We will measure physical activity at work using the Physical Workload Index questionnaire (Hollmann et al, 1999), a reliable and valid instrument to assess the frequency of people's engagement in different postures and tasks while at work. The RPAQ has acceptable measurement properties and assesses frequency and duration of sports-related physical activity .…”
Section: Predictors and Outcomes Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complement the assessment of different types of physical activity, we will use the long and short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; Hagstromer et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2011), the Physical Workload Index questionnaire (Hollmann et al, 1999), and the Recent Physical Activity questionnaire (RPAQ; Besson et al, 2010). The IPAQ has acceptable measurement properties (Hagstromer et al, 2006) and assesses frequency and duration of physical activity in five different domains (i.e., occupation, transportation, domestic work, recreation, sedentary activity; Hagstromer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Predictors and Outcomes Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation