2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an analytical method for the determination of cadmium, lead and mercury in fish and fishery resources by graphite furnace and Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beside LOD and LOQ, the precision value has been determined by measuring 0.5 µM Cd(II) in 6 replicates and can be reported as the value of percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD). Based on the calculated results, %RSD value for Cd(II) measurements using DPASV technique was reported as 0.66% and can be considered as good precision due its value lower than 5% (Perelonia et al, 2021). From these values, it is clear that this developed method has a good analytical performance and can be potentially used for Cd(II) measurement in the real sample such as in water spinach.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection Limit Of Quantitation and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beside LOD and LOQ, the precision value has been determined by measuring 0.5 µM Cd(II) in 6 replicates and can be reported as the value of percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD). Based on the calculated results, %RSD value for Cd(II) measurements using DPASV technique was reported as 0.66% and can be considered as good precision due its value lower than 5% (Perelonia et al, 2021). From these values, it is clear that this developed method has a good analytical performance and can be potentially used for Cd(II) measurement in the real sample such as in water spinach.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection Limit Of Quantitation and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Various analytical methods have been developed for cadmium(II) detection such as colorimetry (Laosuwan, Poonsawat, Burakham, Srijaranai, & Mukdasai, 2021), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Teheni, Nafie, & Dali, 2016;Male et al, 2017;Bijang, Tanasale, Kelrey, Mansur, & Azis, 2021;Perelonia et al, 2021), inductively coupled plasmamass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) (Li, Huang, Zeng, Lin, & Huang, 2021), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) (Chebakova et al, 2021), inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectrometry tandem with mass spectrometry (ICP-OES-MS) (Lundovskaya, Medvedev, Tsygankova, Volzhenin, & Saprykin, 2021), and Raman spectroscopy (Guo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, validation parameters characteristic of analytical methods were evaluated following the recommendations of [29][30][31] and those reported by other authors [27,32]. Validation parameters such as linearity, accuracy, precision, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), and uncertainty were evaluated.…”
Section: Validation Of Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, copper ions detecting is necessary which plays an important role in the management of water resource and healthcare. Traditional methods for detecting metal ions including Cu 2+ involved atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [ 37 ], atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) [ 38 ], spectrophotometry [ 39 ], electrochemical analysis [ 40 ] and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry [ 41 ]. However, these methods require high investment, complex sample pretreatment, and not sensitive enough for low concentration detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%