2020
DOI: 10.1111/joca.12305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Consumer Styles Inventory for consumer decision making styles

Abstract: The Consumer Styles Inventory (CSI) developed by Sproles and Kendall, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 1986, 20: 267-279, is one of the most widely used instruments to classify consumers by their decision making styles. With changes in consumption culture attributable to the coexistence of global and local consumer culture in the past few decades, it is essential to reaffirm that the CSI measurement instrument is valid for contemporary consumers and can be applied in various contexts. This study, therefore, aimed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the time, this measurement instrument has fetched significant research attention, and there are several investigations based on this inventory in measuring context-specific and/or culturespecific differences (Helmi, Komaladewi, Sarasi, & Yolanda, 2023;Ma & Hahn, 2022). The instrument ranging back to several years is required to be tested for its validity in current contexts, and therefore recently, Eom, Youn, and Lee (2020) tested the inventory on two different groups of participants in the US, and reaffirmed its applicability and validity for studying decision-making styles of contemporary customers. Consequently, the significant studies in this direction (Islam & Chandrasekaran, 2020;Tarnanidis et al, 2015) establish CSI as a robust instrument to measure consumer decision-making styles in various contexts.…”
Section: Executing Marketing Through a Gender Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the time, this measurement instrument has fetched significant research attention, and there are several investigations based on this inventory in measuring context-specific and/or culturespecific differences (Helmi, Komaladewi, Sarasi, & Yolanda, 2023;Ma & Hahn, 2022). The instrument ranging back to several years is required to be tested for its validity in current contexts, and therefore recently, Eom, Youn, and Lee (2020) tested the inventory on two different groups of participants in the US, and reaffirmed its applicability and validity for studying decision-making styles of contemporary customers. Consequently, the significant studies in this direction (Islam & Chandrasekaran, 2020;Tarnanidis et al, 2015) establish CSI as a robust instrument to measure consumer decision-making styles in various contexts.…”
Section: Executing Marketing Through a Gender Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is a paucity of research on how different genders behave while making their purchase decisions based on different decision-making styles they carry. In addition, vast majority of relevant literature is focused on studies in developed countries (Eom et al, 2020;Nayeem & Casidy, 2015;Tarnanidis et al, 2015), where a little research has worked upon understanding the phenomena in emerging economies, despite the significant difference of population composition and consumer behavior in these nations (Ra skovi c et al, 2020). Sproles and Kendall (1986) has propounded eight consumer characteristics based on decision-making styles, i.e.…”
Section: Executing Marketing Through a Gender Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Eom et al (2020) applied exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to reconfirm the eight decision‐making styles of CSI. The eight decision making styles which are frequently used to measure shopping orientations include: quality consciousness, brand consciousness, fashion consciousness, hedonistic consciousness, price consciousness, impulsiveness, confused by over choice, and brand loyalty.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian mengenai gaya pengambilan keputusan konsumen telah dilakukan di berbagai negara, beberapa diantaranya seperti: Iran (Azizi & Makizadeh, 2012; Mohsenin, Sharifsamet, Esfidani, & Skoufa, 2018 ), Korea Selatan (Seo & Moon, 2016), Tiongkok (Wang, He, & Chen, 2014), India (Lysonski & Durvasula, 2013; Tanksale, Neelam, & Venkatachalam, 2014), Suriah (Ramadan, 2016), dan Amerika Serikat (Eom, Youn, & Lee, 2020). Gaya pengambilan keputusan konsumen pun telah diteliti di Indonesia (Yulianto & Dharmawan, 2018;Tresia & Sokang, 2019).…”
Section: Aunclassified