Validation of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measures of Abdominal Fat by Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an Indian Population

Abstract

ObjectiveAbdominal adiposity is an important risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular disease in Indians. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to determine abdominal fat depots, being more accessible and less costly than gold standard measures such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DXA has not been fully validated for use in South Asians. Here, we determined the accuracy of DXA for measurement of abdominal fat in an Indian population by comparison with MRI.Design146 males and females (age range 18–74, BMI range 15–46 kg/m2) from Hyderabad, India underwent whole body DXA scans on a Hologic Discovery A scanner, from which fat mass in two abdominal regions was calculated, from the L1 to L4 vertebrae (L1L4) and from the L2 to L4 vertebrae (L2L4). Abdominal MRI scans (axial T1-weighted spin echo images) were taken, from which adipose tissue volumes were calculated for the same regions.ResultsIntra-class correlation coefficients between DXA and MRI measures of abdominal fat were high (0.98 for both regions). Although at the level of the individual, differences between DXA and MRI could be large (95% of DXA measures were between 0.8 and 1.4 times MRI measures), at the sample level, DXA only slightly overestimated MRI measures of abdominal fat mass (mean difference in L1L4 region: 2% (95% CI:0%, 5%), mean difference in L2L4 region:4% (95% CI: 1%, 7%)). There was evidence of a proportional bias in the association between DXA and MRI (correlation between difference and mean −0.3), with overestimation by DXA greater in individuals with less abdominal fat (mean bias in leaner half of sample was 6% for L1L4 (95%CI: 2, 11%) and 7% for L2L4 (95% CI:3,12%).ConclusionsDXA measures of abdominal fat are suitable for use in Indian populations and provide a good indication of abdominal adiposity at the population level.

Estimation of visceral fat in 9‐ to 13‐year‐old girls using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) and anthropometry

“…This software estimate of VF was previously validated in an adult sample by Kaul et al (15), using the criterion measure of abdominal X-ray CT in 109 adult participants. Other successful estimations of VF in adults using DXA have been made in recent years using MRI as the criterion method with studies reporting that VF measurement by DXA is strongly correlated with MRI VF (28)(29)(30)(31). None of these studies included children in their sample.…”

Markers of metabolic and cardiovascular health in adults: Comparative analysis of DEXA-based body composition components and BMI categories

“…The assessment of body composition was performed with a DEXA scan (Hologic Discovery; Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) [8]. The instrument was calibrated by using a spine phantom daily and a step phantom weekly.…”

Abdominal Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Burden in Adolescents—Penn State Children Cohort Study

“…Comparing to the anthropometric measurements, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides direct and accurate measurements of the abdominal fat distribution. This method has been validated against various “gold standard”, including underwater weighing (10), computed tomography (11), and magnetic resonance imaging (12). Because of the low radiation and cost, DXA is a practical tool to quantify the abdominal fat distribution.…”