Validation of farsi translation of the ocular surface disease index

Pakdel, Farzad; Gohari, Mahmood Reza; Jazayeri, Anis Sadat; Amani, Afsaneh; Pirmarzdashti, Niloofar; Aghaee, Hossein

doi:10.4103/jovr.jovr_92_16

Cited by 29 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The OSDI total score can be used to classify the respondent's dry eye symptoms as normal (0-12 points), mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) [30][31][32]. This questionnaire was originally developed in English [29] with subsequent translations and validations in Portuguese [33], Spanish [34], Farsi [35], Bahasa [36], Chinese [37], Filipino [38], and Japanese [39]. However, caution should be applied when using it, given that the cutoff values for DED differ across languages, with a threshold of 27.2 and 36.3 points in the Chinese and Japanese versions, respectively [37,39,40].…”

Section: Ocular Surface Disease Index (Osdi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CLDEQ-8 can evaluate changes in subjective symptoms when changing contact lens type. [57] CDERQOL [54] NEI VFQ−25 [60] OCI [78] Insufficient * 4 DEQ [73] OSD [74] TERTC-DEQ [76] McMonnies questionnaire [80] Schein questionnaire [83] Women's Health Study questionnaire [87] SPEED [90] SANDE [92] DEQ-5 [43] No English, Portuguese, [33], Spanish [34], Farsi [35], Bahasa [36], Chinese [37], Filipino [38], Japanese (J-OSDI) [ : Good validity and reliability according to the PRO guidance; : Insufficient description of psychometric properties or poor validity and reliability; ×: No description of psychometric properties; N/A: Not applicable, score calculation method is not mentioned; Not scored *: There is no score for each question item. J-OSDI: Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index, OCI-C: Chinese version of the Ocular Comfort Index, J-CLDEQ-8: Japanese Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8.…”

Section: Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (Cldeq-8)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dry eye disease (DED) is among the most common eye diseases and is becoming increasingly prevalent. Its symptoms cause a long-term decline in patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL). Inconsistencies often occur between the clinical findings and the subjective symptoms of DED. Therefore, a holistic, balanced, and quantitative evaluation of the subjective symptoms and HRQL using patient-reported outcome questionnaires, in addition to clinical findings, is crucial for accurate DED assessment in patients. This paper reviewed the characteristics of current dry eye questionnaires, including their objectives, number of questions, inclusion of HRQL-related items, and whether they were properly evaluated for psychometric properties. Twenty-four questionnaires were identified; among them, the following six questionnaires that included items assessing HRQL and were properly evaluated for psychometric properties are recommended: the Ocular Surface Disease Index, Impact of Dry Eye in Everyday Life, Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-life Score, University of North Carolina Dry Eye Management Scale, Chinese version of Dry Eye-Related Quality of Life, and 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Dry eye questionnaires have different objectives and are available in different languages. Therefore, medical practitioners should confirm the characteristics of applicable questionnaires before selecting the most appropriate ones.

show abstract

Section: Ocular Surface Disease Index (Osdi)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (Cldeq-8)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS)12 are widely used to assess subjective symptoms of DED in Japan, but the reliability and validity of the OSDI have not been confirmed in Japan 13. Determining the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the OSDI (J-OSDI) is essential for making epidemiological and symptomatic comparisons with other countries 13–16…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire is widely used to evaluate subjective symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) as a primary diagnostic criterion. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the OSDI (J-OSDI) and assess its reliability and validity.Design and settingHospital-based cross-sectional observational study.ParticipantsA total of 209 patients recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology at Juntendo University Hospital.MethodsWe translated and culturally adapted the OSDI into Japanese. The J-OSDI was then assessed for internal consistency, reliability and validity. We also evaluated the optimal cut-off value to suspect DED using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.Primary outcome measuresInternal consistency, test–retest reliability and discriminant validity of the J-OSDI as well as the optimal cut-off value to suspect DED.ResultsOf the participants, 152 had DED and 57 did not. The J-OSDI total score showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.884), test–retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient=0.910) and discriminant validity by known-group comparisons (non-DED, 19.4±16.0; DED, 37.7±22.2; p<0.001). Factor validity was used to confirm three subscales within the J-OSDI according to the original version of the questionnaire. Concurrent validity was assessed by Pearson correlation analysis, and the J-OSDI total score showed a strong positive correlation with the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (γ=0.829). The optimal cut-off value of the J-OSDI total score was 36.3 (AUC=0.744).ConclusionsThe J-OSDI was developed and validated in terms of reliability and validity as an effective tool for DED assessment and monitoring in the Japanese population.

show abstract

“…Subjective tests can always have some type of error (40), due to the fact that there are variables inherent to patients (41), which cannot be controlled either (42), and it should also be considered that objective tests are capable of generating a tear reflex (43). This alters the results of the tests (44), which could mean that the fewer invasive techniques are performed, the more reliable the result will be.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In countries such as France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, it has been reported that dry eye syndrome produces an average net cost in treatment for the patient between $ 273,000 and $ 1,100,000 every year. In that sense, and considering that dry eye occurs in patients over 40 to prevent the disease and improve the health conditions of the Mexican population.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Dry Eye in Patients at the FESI Optometry Clinic, UNAM

Luna

Vázquez-Mendoza²,

Trujillo³

et al. 2019

Cienc. Tecnol. Salud Vis. Ocul.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prevalencia de ojo seco en pacientes que acuden a la Clínica de Prevalencia de ojo seco en pacientes que acuden a la Clínica de Optometría de la FESI, UNAM * La presente investigación no depende de ningún proyecto institucional o subvención económica. En ella tampoco existe conflicto de intereses con los autores. ** BA in Optometry, in charge Prevalencia de ojo seco en pacientes que acuden a la ABSTRACT Objetive: To report the prevalence of dry eye and to determine the differences between young and adult patients attending the Optometry Clinic of the Iztacala School of Higher Education at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Material and methods: In 1957, patients between the ages of 15 and 65 assessed at the "Centro de Diagnóstico de Alteraciones de Superficie Ocular" of the Iztacala School of Higher Education of UNAM between August 2016 and August 2017. The patients answered the digital version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) diagnostic questionnaire and the mucin arborization pattern was evaluated using the Tear Ferning Test (TFT). Results: The mean prevalence of the diagnosis with a significant difference of positive P<0.05 for Ferning (59.1%) and OSDI (63.8%). Using the Ferning technique in young patients (15 to 29 years), it was possible to assess a prevalence of dry eye of 51.9%; whereas in adults (30 to 65 years) it was 66.9%. Using the OSDI questionnaire, the prevalence was 60.1% in young people and 67.8% in adults; in addition, for each year of increase in age, the probability of having a dry eye increased by 1% with OSDI and 2% with Ferning. Conclusions: With this study, it was established, for the first time, that the young people who go to the optometry clinic of FES-Iztacala, a sector that had not been previously considered, also suffer from this disease.

show abstract

Validation of farsi translation of the ocular surface disease index

Cited by 29 publications

References 7 publications

A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease

Prevalence of Dry Eye in Patients at the FESI Optometry Clinic, UNAM

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About