2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2006.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of FDS for the prediction of medium-scale pool fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the information gained for the model parameter Sc t can be used in future validation processes. Previous studies of Sc t that showed a very small effect on the flow characteristics were performed with few values over a small range [51][52][53][54]. The present analysis checked 50,000 random points over a range of 0.4-10,000 to determine a range of 0.61-1.89 for consistent results.…”
Section: Information Feedback and Feed Forwardmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the information gained for the model parameter Sc t can be used in future validation processes. Previous studies of Sc t that showed a very small effect on the flow characteristics were performed with few values over a small range [51][52][53][54]. The present analysis checked 50,000 random points over a range of 0.4-10,000 to determine a range of 0.61-1.89 for consistent results.…”
Section: Information Feedback and Feed Forwardmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Xin et al [51] used an Sc t value of 0.4 in the simulation of a methane pool fire and stated that Sc t did not have a significant influence on simulation output. Other researchers have also claimed that the choice of Sc t is unimportant compared with other variables [53,54]. On the other hand, Yimer et al [52] reported a wide range of values (0.2-0.85) and highlighted their effect on the flow field predictions.…”
Section: Determine I/u Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers [5][6][7][8][9][10] have discussed the comparisons between the FDS numerical model results and the full-scale fire experimental parameters, such as HRR (heat release rate), CO, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), temperature and soot, in various buildings. In addition, there are room liquid fire simulation [11] and smoke characteristics analysis [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more effective techniques are being suggested by many researchers and the numerical analysis is increasingly gaining reliability through various case studies on the real fire tests and comparative verification. As a study of the numerical analysis on the flame of laboratory level, Hamins et al [1] analyzed the combustion phenomena of a wax candle, and the study result on the mediumscale pool fire was verified by Wen et al [2]. Recently, heat flux and flame height of the blaze predicted in SBI (single burning item) were researched by Jianping et al [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%