2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of SeaWiFS and MODIS aerosol products with globally distributed AERONET data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analysis, however, indicates that slight variations of location and size of the nearby satellite pixels sampling location may not significantly alter final comparisons [70]. Therefore, it is unlikely that the location of the 5 × 5 pixel-box used in the study significantly affected overall uncertainty and bias results.…”
Section: Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous analysis, however, indicates that slight variations of location and size of the nearby satellite pixels sampling location may not significantly alter final comparisons [70]. Therefore, it is unlikely that the location of the 5 × 5 pixel-box used in the study significantly affected overall uncertainty and bias results.…”
Section: Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, in the southern latitudes (south of 40 • ) the sunphotometer AODs are low compared with satellite retrievals and modeling results. This discrepancy can be explained, at least partly, by uncertainties in aerosol production rates (Lewis and Schwartz, 2004), foam formation and its latitudinal distribution (Anguelova and Webster, 2006), by a process of quality control that excludes some residual cloud contamination (Zhang and Reid, 2010), by the accuracy of radiative transfer models used (Melin et al, 2010), and more accurate accounting for surface reflectance effects (Sayer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Comparison With Satellite Retrievals and Global Transport Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the southern latitudes (south of 40 • ) the sunphotometer AODs are low compared with satellite retrievals (Smirnov et al, 2006. This discrepancy can be explained, at least partly, by uncertainties in foam formation and its latitudinal distribution (Anguelova and Webster, 2006), by a process of quality control that excludes some residual cloud contamination (Zhang and Reid, 2010), by the accuracy of radiative transfer models used (Melin et al, 2010), and by more accurate accounting for surface reflectance effects in satellite retrievals (Sayer et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%