2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of uRANS-Simulations of Contra-Rotating Open Rotor-Powered Aircraft at Take-Off Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As found in previous research, [22][23][24][25] the predicition of the key mean performance metrics is less dependent on the temporal resolution used in the uRANS simulation. The overall fan pressure ration (FPR) and the mass flow rate through the aft propulsor are two of the main performance measures in focus in this study.…”
Section: Iva Urans Simulation Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As found in previous research, [22][23][24][25] the predicition of the key mean performance metrics is less dependent on the temporal resolution used in the uRANS simulation. The overall fan pressure ration (FPR) and the mass flow rate through the aft propulsor are two of the main performance measures in focus in this study.…”
Section: Iva Urans Simulation Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The uRANS simulation approach for the complete aft propulsor aircraft configuration builds on experience gained in the recent past on similar studies on the propulsion-airframe integration for CROR and UHBR engines. [22][23][24][25] In this approach, the computations are initialized with a steady-state simulation in which the rotors remain stationary. In the subsequent unsteady simulation, a step-by-step refinement of the time-step size is performed, with the aim of studying the impact of the temporal resolution on the aerodynamic results, in particular the fan-OGV interactions.…”
Section: Iiib the Urans Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All CFD simulations are performed utilizing the DLR TAU-Code for both the steady RANS and the uRANS computations. For the latter, much know-how was transferred from a process chain that has already been successfully applied in a number of recent propeller and CROR investigations [1,[9][10][11][12][13][14], where validation with wind tunnel test data has shown high-quality engine performance predictions for various isolated and installed configurations is achievable, with deviations of less than 1% to the experimental values.…”
Section: Computational Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, URANS model provide a very time effective numerical solutions for flow analysis and still a prefer approach in aerodynamic and aeroacoustics industry for large number of numerical simulations without compromising much accuracy. [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] Therefore, URANS model is used to simulate 392 configurations. A reference model was made without grooves and drag and lift coefficient results are validated against the study presented by Diasinos et al, 24 with less than 1% deviation.…”
Section: Numerical Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%