Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions

Toledano‐Toledano, Filiberto; Rubia, José Moral de la; McCubbin, Laurie D.; Liebenberg, Linda; Jiménez, Jesús Alejandro Vera; Rivera-Rivera, Leonor; Hart, Angie; Barajas-Nava, Leticia A.; García, Martínez; Martínez-Valverde, Silvia; Aragón, Sofía Rivera; Sánchez‐Gómez, Concepción; Guzmán, Laura Villavicencio; García, Victor Granados; Garduño-Espinosa, Juan

doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0817-3

Cited by 21 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The data collection was conducted by personnel in the Evidence-Based Medicine Research Unit of the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez National Institute of Health, under the direction of the first author of this study as a part of a broader research project [9]. Data collection lasted approximately four months during 2018 and took place in the rooms of the hospitalized children and in the waiting rooms of the different medical services of the institution.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Depression is one of the most significant psychological consequences experienced by family caregivers of children with chronic diseases [FCCCD] [1–9]. Depression is a psychological disorder characterized by the presence of sadness, loss of interest and pleasure, feelings of guilt, problems with sleep, fatigue, lack of appetite, and difficulty concentrating.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the case of FCCCD specifically, depression is significantly associated with psychopathology, such as anxiety [3,11–14], caregiver burden [11,14,15], or stress [7]. Additionally, previous findings demonstrate that depression is negatively associated with quality of life and psychological well-being in FCCCD [3,9,13,16–18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Toledano‐Toledano

Contreras-Valdez

2018

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundInformation on the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases is currently unavailable, indicating a significant gap in the literature. Therefore, we investigated 1) which of the five evaluated measurement models had the best fit, 2) the scale’s reliability, and 3) the scale’s convergent validity.MethodSIn 2018, a cross-sectional ex post facto study with non-probability convenience sampling was conducted in 446 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases at the National Institute of Health in Mexico City; the family caregivers responded to the BDI-II and a battery of instruments measuring anxiety, caregiver burden, parental stress, well-being, and quality of life. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine the fit of the five models. Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability were calculated to assess the scale’s reliability, and Spearman´s rank correlation was used to investigate the scale’s convergent validity.ResultsThis study provided evidence that the two-factor somatic-affective and cognitive model had the best fit. The BDI-II demonstrated adequate reliability and evidence of convergent validity, as the BDI-II factors were positively correlated with anxiety, caregiver burden, and parental stress and negatively correlated with well-being and quality of life.ConclusionsThe findings reveal that the BDI-II is a valid, reliable, and culturally relevant instrument to measure depression in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Toledano‐Toledano

Contreras-Valdez

2018

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, empirical evidence has shown that the use of active coping strategies is related to an increase in well-being, reduction in perceived stress, and a process of positive adaptation despite the loss of health; it involves the development of vitality and skills to overcome the negative effects of adversity, risks, and vulnerability caused by disease [6]. Because coping behaviors have a positive effect on both children's and caregivers' well-being, a compelling need exists to establish meaningful ways to assess how parental caregivers respond to the challenges of children with chronic diseases [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brief version of the coping health inventory for parents (CHIP) among family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Toledano‐Toledano

Rubia

McCubbin

et al. 2020

Health Qual Life Outcomes

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) has demonstrated good psychometric properties in several language forms and has been used to assess the coping behaviors of families facing disease. However, the CHIP has not been validated in Mexico among families of children with chronic conditions, where it could be useful for research and intervention. The objectives of this instrumental study were to obtain a version of the CHIP for the Spanish language in Mexico, establish the factor structure of the Mexican version of the CHIP, probe its internal consistency reliability, and assess its concurrent construct validity. Methods: A nonprobability sample of 405 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases responded to a battery of measurement instruments that included the CHIP, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The sample was randomly divided into two parts. In one subsample (190 participants), an exploratory factor analysis was performed using a principal component analysis and oblique rotation. In the second subsample (215 participants), a confirmatory factor analysis was performed using maximum likelihood estimation. Results: The scale was reduced to 16 items (CHIP-16) with factorial loads greater than .50. The empirical criteria used to determine the number of factors converged on the following five factors: belief and trust (McDonald ω = .85), spouse/partner relationship (ω = .79), home care (ω = .77), family involvement (ω = .75), and security/ stability (ω = .79). The overall internal consistency was good (ω = .88). The five-factor model showed acceptable fit indices and high parsimony. The mean CHIP-16 scores and the Spouse/partner relationship scores among the caregivers with anxiety were greater than those among the caregivers without anxiety. The mean home-care scores among the women were greater than those among men. Conclusions: The 16-item version of the CHIP showed good internal consistency and construct validity; thus, the CHIP-16 is a useful instrument for measuring and assessing coping in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.

show abstract

“…11 Paediatric chronic diseases have physical, psychological and socioeconomic effects not only on patients, but also on their families. 12,13 Psychological consequences such as depression, anxiety and stress are commonly experienced by family caregivers of children with chronic diseases. 13,14 As concerns about myopia increase or complications can increase the mental burden on the patient and his/her parents, we hypothesized that most parents of patients with high myopia may experience negative psychological effects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mental health status of parents of young patients with high myopia

Guo

Sun

et al. 2020

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aim was to investigate the mental health status of parents of patients with high myopia using the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90). Methods: The parents of 160 young patients with high myopia (high myopia group) and 80 healthy children (control group) participated in the study. The SCL-90 was used to evaluate mental health status. The SCL-90 total score and scores on each factor were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results: The total SCL-90 score, total mean score, positive score and scores on somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, psychosis, diet and sleep were significantly higher in fathers and mothers of patients with high myopia than in parents of control group children. There were statistically significant between-group differences in the above indices. Conclusion: Parents of children with high myopia are more likely to develop mental health problems than parents of healthy children. This suggests that mental health interventions for parents should not be ignored in the treatment and control of high myopia patients.

show abstract

Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions

Cited by 21 publications

References 44 publications

Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Brief version of the coping health inventory for parents (CHIP) among family caregivers of children with chronic diseases

Mental health status of parents of young patients with high myopia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About