2013
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and accuracy in interpretation of consolidation on chest radiography for diagnosing pneumonia in children under 5 years of age

Abstract: Overall agreement for identification of consolidation on chest radiographs was good, but agreement adjusted for chance was only moderate and did not vary with patient characteristics. Clinicians need to be aware that chest radiography is an imperfect test for diagnosing pneumonia and has considerable variability in its interpretation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, equipoise exists as to whether radiologic progression is clinically meaningful. The use of radiologic progression in clinical trials is limited by the fact that qualitative chest radiographic interpretations do not precisely capture degrees of change in radiologic severity [9,10]. Moreover, qualitative chest radiograph interpretations have significant inter-observer variability (i.e., low reliability) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, equipoise exists as to whether radiologic progression is clinically meaningful. The use of radiologic progression in clinical trials is limited by the fact that qualitative chest radiographic interpretations do not precisely capture degrees of change in radiologic severity [9,10]. Moreover, qualitative chest radiograph interpretations have significant inter-observer variability (i.e., low reliability) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 120 CD + CXR 98.0 95.0 Shah et al, 21 Esposito et al 12 200 103 CXR CXR 86.0 97.9 89.0 94. 5 Reali et al 22 107 CD + CXR 94.0 96.0 Iorio et al 13 52 CD + CXR 96.5 95.6 Urbankowska et al 23 106 CXR 93.4 100.0 Ambroggio et al 18 132 CT 63.0 75.0 Samson et al 17 Zhan et al 24 200 82 CXR CXR 87.1 40.0 94.8 91.0 Sn: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; CXR: chest X-ray; CD: clinical diagnosis; CT: computed tomography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In older child more common cause organism of pneumonia is bacterial, and among the bacteria, Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae are common and they commonly presented with lobar pneumonia. [15][16][17][18][19] But most common radiological findings in severe and very severe pneumonia was bronchopneumonia (multiple heterogeneous opacity in multiple lobes of lungs), followed by multilobar pneumonia, because diffuse involvement of lungs by multiple heterogeneous opacity or multiple lobar pneumonia, more affect the gas exchange and produce clinical severe pneumonia. 20 Patient having bronchopneumonia also required more level of care like O2 inhalation, ICU care and ventilatory support in comparison to other pneumonia and duration of hospitalization is also more in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%