Background: The fluorescence intensities of CD3, CD4 on T cells and CD20, CD22 molecules on B cells were quantitatively measured on lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and healthy donors.Methods: The performance of three different types of microbeads was compared, i.e. Quantum molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (Q-MESF), Quantum simply cellular (QSC), and QuantiBRITE TM (QB). As all PE-conjugates had a F/P ratio of 1:1, the MESF units represented also the antibody binding capacity (ABC).Results: The ABCs of CD4 and CD20 antigens estimated with QSC (ABC QSC ) were higher than those assigned with QB (ABC QB ) with an average difference 49%. Higher numbers of antigenic sites were obtained with Q-MESF than with QSC for CD20 antigen. On the contrary, CD4 antigenic sites numbers estimated with QSC were higher than those estimated with Q-MESF. ABC values estimated with Quantum MESF PE (ABC Q-MESF ) were *15% higher than ABC QSC , whereas ABC Q-MESF was *49% higher than ABC QB
INTRODUCTIONQuantitative measurements of fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry (QFCM) assess the numbers of monoclonal antibody (mAb) molecules bound to a cell. The fluorescence intensity (FI) of staining correlates to the number of fluorochrome conjugated mAb molecules bound to the cell, and consequently, the amount of receptors on the cell. Thus, the number of antigen receptors can be determined by QFCM, through estimation of the exact numbers of bound fluorescent antibody molecules, provided that appropriate standards and fluorescence controls are tested in parallel and reagents in saturating amounts are used. In addition, the process of quantitation facilitates standardization and quality control (1).