Variability in CT lung-nodule quantification: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods on density and texture based features

Abstract

Purpose:To investigate the effects of dose level and reconstruction method on density and texture based features computed from CT lung nodules.Methods:This study had two major components. In the first component, a uniform water phantom was scanned at three dose levels and images were reconstructed using four conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) and four iterative reconstruction (IR) methods for a total of 24 different combinations of acquisition and reconstruction conditions. In the second component, raw projection (sinogram) data were obtained for 33 lung nodules from patients scanned as a part of their clinical practice, where low dose acquisitions were simulated by adding noise to sinograms acquired at clinical dose levels (a total of four dose levels) and reconstructed using one FBP kernel and two IR kernels for a total of 12 conditions. For the water phantom, spherical regions of interest (ROIs) were created at multiple locations within the water phantom on one reference image obtained at a reference condition. For the lung nodule cases, the ROI of each nodule was contoured semiautomatically (with manual editing) from images obtained at a reference condition. All ROIs were applied to their corresponding images reconstructed at different conditions. For 17 of the nodule cases, repeat contours were performed to assess repeatability. Histogram (eight features) and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) based texture features (34 features) were computed for all ROIs. For the lung nodule cases, the reference condition was selected to be 100% of clinical dose with FBP reconstruction using the B45f kernel; feature values calculated from other conditions were compared to this reference condition. A measure was introduced, which the authors refer to as Q, to assess the stability of features across different conditions, which is defined as the ratio of reproducibility (across conditions) to repeatability (across repeat contours) of each feature.Results:The water phantom results demonstrated substantial variability among feature values calculated across conditions, with the exception of histogram mean. Features calculated from lung nodules demonstrated similar results with histogram mean as the most robust feature (Q ≤ 1), having a mean and standard deviation Q of 0.37 and 0.22, respectively. Surprisingly, histogram standard deviation and variance features were also quite robust. Some GLCM features were also quite robust across conditions, namely, diff. variance, sum variance, sum average, variance, and mean. Except for histogram mean, all features have a Q of larger than one in at least one of the 3% dose level conditions.Conclusions:As expected, the histogram mean is the most robust feature in their study. The effects of acquisition and reconstruction conditions on GLCM features vary widely, though trending toward features involving summation of product between intensities and probabilities being more robust, barring a few exceptions. Overall, care should be taken into account for variation in density and textu...

Reliability of CT radiomic features reflecting tumour heterogeneity according to image quality and image processing parameters

“…Several studies have shown that various conditions affecting image quality significantly influence the reliability of RF measurements. For example, inconsistencies across CT scanners such as, spatial resolution, tube current, noise, and reconstruction algorithm may decrease the reliability of CT-derived RFs [9][10][11][12][13][14] . The reliability of RFs also depends on the techniques used for lesion segmentation, grey-level discretization and quantization range 8,[15][16][17][18] .…”

Computer-Aided Detection, Pulmonary Embolism, Computerized Tomography Pulmonary Angiography: Current Status

“…As reducing X-ray dose is main concern in imaging, different vendors provide imaging protocols and reconstruction techniques to reduce patient dose without substantially risking the image quality. These ultra-low dose, or even low dose, settings lead to lower contrast to noise ratio, which in turn leads to higher possibility to CT artifacts and lower capability to spot diseases [51][52][53]. These parameters are relevant to any CAD system [2,3,47,48], so can greatly affect the PE CAD performance.…”

“…This include, the supported range of equipment, CTPA image acquisition settings, patient preparation requirements, reconstruction algorithms, and patient special cases such as those with additional lung defects, among other relevant factors, that radiologist need to be aware during the use of CTPA-CAD. Additionally, in case of CTPA-CAD comparison with findings from previous CTPA scans is used to assess decisions on diagnosis, disease progression, and/or treatment effectiveness, care must be considered to match the acquisition conditions accordingly to CTPA-CAD operating manual [2,3,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”

Technical Note: FreeCT_ICD: An open‐source implementation of a model‐based iterative reconstruction method using coordinate descent optimization for CT imaging investigations

“…These tools have enabled the development of reconstruction pipelines that are not dependent on the availability of clinical CT scanners, can be configured to operate in high‐throughput batch modes, can incorporate simulated dose reduction techniques and therefore can produce a large collection of image datasets that represent a wide range of acquisition and reconstruction settings such as different slice thicknesses and reconstruction kernels used in wFBP. The results of these reconstruction pipelines have contributed to the growing list of investigations evaluating the robustness of quantitative imaging, radiomics, and CAD methods across a range of scanner platforms, acquisition conditions and reconstruction parameters …”

“…The results of these reconstruction pipelines have contributed to the growing list of investigations evaluating the robustness of quantitative imaging, radiomics, and CAD methods across a range of scanner platforms, acquisition conditions and reconstruction parameters. 2,[4][5][6][7][8][9] While this previous work was valuable and informative, it was limited to conventional wFBP reconstructions. Modern scanners offer advanced image reconstruction techniques that use some form of statistical or iterative reconstruction.…”