2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in biomass distribution and nutrient content in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) clones having contrasting crown architecture and growth efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although specific comparisons are lacking in the literature, crown-based ideotypes have become a point of emphasis in recent years (e.g., Martin et al 2001, Villacorta et al 2015 and might lead to structural departures that should be accounted for in equations designed to predict biomass accumulation for natural-and planted-origin loblolly pine stands. In addition to obvious localized stocking impacts on branchiness and foliage retention, the natural-origin pines were primarily in understory positions and had variable overstory cover (i.e., seed trees) that may have Table 3.…”
Section: Discussion Local Biomass Model Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although specific comparisons are lacking in the literature, crown-based ideotypes have become a point of emphasis in recent years (e.g., Martin et al 2001, Villacorta et al 2015 and might lead to structural departures that should be accounted for in equations designed to predict biomass accumulation for natural-and planted-origin loblolly pine stands. In addition to obvious localized stocking impacts on branchiness and foliage retention, the natural-origin pines were primarily in understory positions and had variable overstory cover (i.e., seed trees) that may have Table 3.…”
Section: Discussion Local Biomass Model Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Brackin et al (2015) recently attributed the low N efficiencies of inorganic forms in crop systems, such as sugar cane, and the N loss to the environment, to the capacity of the root to absorb inorganic N being exceeded at certain levels of application, in contrast to organic N that more closely matched the capacity of the root. The second scenario suggests that genotypes with an overall greater performance might be less sensitive to changes in N availability, because of the greater efficiency of N use (Bongarten et al 1987;Garcia Villacorta et al 2015). In fact, recent studies have reported that treatments with organic N forms may contribute more efficiently than inorganic forms to a plant N budget, even at lower concentrations, given the lower carbon cost of assimilation (Franklin et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R 2 ) and root mean square error (RMSE -Socha & Wezyk 2007). Bias correction factors (CF) in the logarithmic transformation were calculated using the standard error of the estimate (Garcia Villacorta et al 2015). Analyses of C and N concentrations were performed using the PROC GLM procedure of the software package SAS ® (SAS Institute 1995), where tree DBH was classed as a covariate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%