2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-006-6398-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venture-backed Private Equity Valuation and Financial Statement Information

Abstract: The relationship between (a) private and public equity market valuations and (b) financial statement information is examined for a sample of 502 venture capital backed companies from six different industries over the 1993-2003 period. Financial statement information explains a sizable component of the levels of and changes in valuation in both the Pre-IPO and Post-IPO periods. The findings support prior research for Post-IPO companies that revenues are value enhancing and costs are value diminishing. For the P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 10 Some very high one-and two-year-ahead forecasted growth rates are in part due to companies that have very low revenues in the denominator of the growth rate calculation. 11 The dominance of reported losses in our sample echoes the results reported by Armstrong, Dávila and Foster (2006). They report that for a sample of 502 venture-backed companies that went public, the 10 th through 70 th percentiles of net income is always negative in each of the three years prior to the IPO, the year of the IPO, and the three years immediately following the IPO.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 10 Some very high one-and two-year-ahead forecasted growth rates are in part due to companies that have very low revenues in the denominator of the growth rate calculation. 11 The dominance of reported losses in our sample echoes the results reported by Armstrong, Dávila and Foster (2006). They report that for a sample of 502 venture-backed companies that went public, the 10 th through 70 th percentiles of net income is always negative in each of the three years prior to the IPO, the year of the IPO, and the three years immediately following the IPO.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…20 This is likely not the case in that VentureOne obtains approximately three-quarters of its actual, historical data from firms' IPO filing documents. 21 In contrast, the fraction of all venture-backed firms that go public is only 10% -15% (Armstrong, Dávila and Foster, 2006). Since firms that go IPO are on average more successful than those that do not, this selection problem in our setting will likely lead to upward-biased historicallygrounded conditional predictions of revenues, expenses and net income.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Historically-grounded Conditmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might partially explain why PE investors have a positive certifying effect on their portfolio companies beyond the mere provision of financing (Gompers and Lerner, 1999). Despite the economic importance of this topic, only a few studies have so far looked at the properties and value relevance of financial reporting in PE backed firms (Armstrong et al, 2006;Beuselinck et al, 2004;Hand, 2005). The present paper adds to this stream of research by acknowledging that not only the mere fact of having a PE investor as shareholder influences the quality of the accounting information, but that also the importance of its ownership stake matters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore control for several owner characteristics in our analysis. Second, financial information can play a substitution or complementary role in early stage private equity transactions (Armstrong, Davila, and Foster, 2006;Hand, 2005;Sievers, Mokwa, and Keienburg, 2013).…”
Section: Outside Equity In Start-up Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%