2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2021.100630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal and practical intelligence in general anxiety, obsessive compulsive and major depression disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 If the included participants were representative of a sample composed of clinically referred examinees with diverse neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurocognitive disorders, it is reasonable to expect that at least subtle-to-mild decreases from normative performance may be detectable in aspects of working memory, processing speed, and/or verbal memory. Prior literature has described such differences from healthy controls in these domains in samples of participants with ADHD (Fuermaier et al, 2015; Poysophon & Rao, 2018; Theiling & Petermann, 2016), psychiatric conditions (Hermens et al, 2011; Moghadasin & Dibajnia, 2021), and mND (Economou et al, 2007; Greenaway et al, 2006; Lumpkin & Sheerin, 2019). As such, it is likely that the participants included by Resch, Soble, et al (2021) were more closely akin to a sample of cognitively intact/healthy participants (i.e., a normative sample) rather than a mixed clinical sample commensurate with typical neuropsychological practice, limiting the extent to which these results are generalizable to other clinically referred examinees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 If the included participants were representative of a sample composed of clinically referred examinees with diverse neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurocognitive disorders, it is reasonable to expect that at least subtle-to-mild decreases from normative performance may be detectable in aspects of working memory, processing speed, and/or verbal memory. Prior literature has described such differences from healthy controls in these domains in samples of participants with ADHD (Fuermaier et al, 2015; Poysophon & Rao, 2018; Theiling & Petermann, 2016), psychiatric conditions (Hermens et al, 2011; Moghadasin & Dibajnia, 2021), and mND (Economou et al, 2007; Greenaway et al, 2006; Lumpkin & Sheerin, 2019). As such, it is likely that the participants included by Resch, Soble, et al (2021) were more closely akin to a sample of cognitively intact/healthy participants (i.e., a normative sample) rather than a mixed clinical sample commensurate with typical neuropsychological practice, limiting the extent to which these results are generalizable to other clinically referred examinees.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%