2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819601029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the reinforced concrete beam model based on the results of a full-scale experimental study

Abstract: The article presents the results of a numerical experiment consisting in a bending test of a reinforced concrete beam and comparison of the results obtained with the results of full-scale experiments. In most cases, it is not possible to adequately consider all types of nonlinearities when using simplified bar and plate elements. The problem can be solved by using more detailed computational models with solid finite elements, allowing to consider directly the joint behavior of reinforcing bars and concrete. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6,9], the results of full-scale tests of elements of building structures are compared with the results of numerical studies in which the main finite elements for concrete are solid finite elements, for reinforcing barsbar finite elements. There is a good convergence of calculation results with experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6,9], the results of full-scale tests of elements of building structures are compared with the results of numerical studies in which the main finite elements for concrete are solid finite elements, for reinforcing barsbar finite elements. There is a good convergence of calculation results with experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper face of the concrete slab was supported with 10 mm bars placed 300 mm apart in both directions, while the bottom face was supported with 12 mm bars spaced 150 mm apart in both directions. The steel mesh was represented using the widely known PIECEWISE LINEAR_PLASTICITY material model [40][41][42], which defines an elastoplastic bilinear behaviour. The values for the material model are considered from the literature and are defined in Table 1.…”
Section: Modelling Of Steel Rebarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. CSCM model (Continuous Surface Cap Model) takes into account the decrease in the modulus of deformation and strength of concrete in the zone of crack formation [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Problem Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%