Proceedings 13th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/vtest.1995.512615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of transient response of linear analog circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been recent applications of equivalence checking on analog designs by digitization of infinite analog state space [22], [23], [24], and model checking by extending temporal logic to capture analog properties [25], [26]. Finally, the prosyd (prosyd.org) project provides an assertion-based run-time monitoring tool supporting STL or PSL properties in analog circuits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been recent applications of equivalence checking on analog designs by digitization of infinite analog state space [22], [23], [24], and model checking by extending temporal logic to capture analog properties [25], [26]. Finally, the prosyd (prosyd.org) project provides an assertion-based run-time monitoring tool supporting STL or PSL properties in analog circuits.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analog circuit verification approaches in the past have used state space techniques [6,7]. However, these schemes are either limited to linear circuits [6] or can become highly simulation intensive for large analog circuits [7].…”
Section: 1: Analog Circuit Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a pessimistic estimate since faults tested by a test stimulus are dropped from further consideration. For large m, the second term can be ignored in comparison to the first, so an approximate bound on test generation time would be (6) For structural faults, the number of backtrace invocations n bt can be treated as a constant w.r.t the number of faults, so the complexity of test generator is approximately O(m).…”
Section: 21: Complexity Of the Test Generation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal verification methods for AMS designs based on equivalence checking [2,14,22], model checking [13,9,3,15], theorem-proving [7,11,10], etc. do not address the problem of verifying integration of large integrated AMS designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%