2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification test problems for the calculation of probability of loss of assured safety in temperature-dependent systems with multiple weak and strong links

Abstract: Four verification test problems are presented for checking the conceptual development and computational implementation of calculations to determine the probability of loss of assured safety (PLOAS) in temperaturedependent systems with multiple weak links (WLs) and strong links (SLs). The problems are designed to test results obtained with the following definitions of loss of assured safety: (i) Failure of all SLs before failure of any WL, (ii) Failure of any SL before failure of any WL, (iii) Failure of all SL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9] This presentation extends previous results by developing representations for PLOAS for the situation in which there is a delay between the time at which a link reaches its failure temperature and the time at which the link actually fails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[7][8][9] This presentation extends previous results by developing representations for PLOAS for the situation in which there is a delay between the time at which a link reaches its failure temperature and the time at which the link actually fails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…7 Further, two related presentations consider the verification of calculations to determine PLOAS. 8,9 A fundamental assumption in the representations for PLOAS studied in Refs. [7][8][9][10] is that a link fails instantly when it reaches its failure temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2.1), Ref. [9]). Further, if CDF WL,j (t) and CDF SL,k (t) correspond to the same function p(t) for j = 1, 2, …, nWL and k = 1, 2, …, nSL…”
Section: Validaitonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(9.3) are also presented in Ref. [9] for several additional definitions of loss of assured safety. These representations and their associated verification tests are summarized in Table 10.…”
Section: Alternate Ploas Definitions and Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%