2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VerSe: A Vertebrae labelling and segmentation benchmark for multi-detector CT images

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
141
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the neural network was trained with healthy individuals only, the automated segmentation process respected the present spinal osteolytic lesions (Fig. 3) [19,20].…”
Section: Results Of Automated Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though the neural network was trained with healthy individuals only, the automated segmentation process respected the present spinal osteolytic lesions (Fig. 3) [19,20].…”
Section: Results Of Automated Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 35 three-dimensional CT datasets were roughly cropped to a longish cuboid containing the thoracolumbar spine. Automated segmentation of the spine was achieved by a pre-trained convolutional neural network [19,20]. Seventeen vertebrae counting from bottom upwards were marked as a volume of interest (VOI) by a Python script.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the Bm And Assessment Of Dect Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although vertebral body segmentation as well as texture analysis are not part of the clinical routine, approaches are feasible without considerable computational efforts. In detail, CT image segmentation and vBMD extraction are already established, automated, computationally optimized, and their computational effort can therefore be considered negligible in comparison to the remaining tasks (when implementing a pipeline such as the herein used CNN-based framework for vertebral body labeling and segmentation with parameter extraction) (43)(44)(45). Details on the computational efficiency of the water-fat separation for generating PDFF and T2* maps have been reported previously for a similar workflow (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From PACS, images were transferred to our in-house developed, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework (https:// anduin.bonescreen.de) (Figures 1 and 2) (43)(44)(45). This tool identifies and labels each vertebra in an automated process, followed by creating corresponding segmentation masks for each vertebra as well as its subregions.…”
Section: Image Processing and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation