2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-011-0629-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical inheritance and bursts of transposition have shaped the evolution of the BS non-LTR retrotransposon in Drosophila

Abstract: The history of transposable elements over evolutionary time can often be partially reconstructed on the basis of genome analysis. In this study, we identified and extensively characterized the NLTR BS retrotransposon in 12 sequenced Drosophila genomes, by its sequence diversity within and among genomes, its degeneration pattern and its transcriptional activity. We show that the BS element has a variable copy number and patchy distribution within the Drosophila genus, that it is at distinct stages of the evolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, BS appears to be transpositionally active in D. melanogaster but inactive in D. simulans [73]. One interpretation is that BS was active in the common ancestor and regulated by Hmr and Lhr .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, BS appears to be transpositionally active in D. melanogaster but inactive in D. simulans [73]. One interpretation is that BS was active in the common ancestor and regulated by Hmr and Lhr .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-LTR retrotransposons are common elements in Drosophila genomes and are often described as vertically inherited in this group of species (Malik et al 1999; Granzotto et al 2011). I- like element sequences have been found in many species, and their distribution correlates with the phylogenetic relationships between species (Bucheton et al 1992), which indicates that they are old components of Drosophila genomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As MITEs are generally <600 bp, size and sequence homogeneity (Feschotte et al . 2002), their copy numbers were calculated based on the following criteria: 1) All fragments showed more than 80% identity and coverage to their consensus sequences and 2) fragments were considered to be a single insertion when they were separated by less than 200 bp (Granzotto et al 2011). Meanwhile, there were two subfamilies of MITEs identified in lizard ( ConanN1_AC and ConanN2_AC ) and the length of ConanN1_AC was about 150 bp longer than that of ConanN2_AC .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%