2011
DOI: 10.1175/2011jas3687.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Structures of Anvil Clouds of Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Observed by CloudSat

Abstract: A global study of the vertical structures of the clouds of tropical mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) has been carried out with data from the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar. Tropical MCSs are found to be dominated by cloud-top heights greater than 10 km. Secondary cloud layers sometimes occur in MCSs, but outside their primary raining cores. The secondary layers have tops at 6-8 and 1-3 km. High-topped clouds extend outward from raining cores of MCSs to form anvil clouds. Closest to the raining cores, the an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This classification is, strictly speaking, based on arbitrary τ and p c thresholds, and clouds assigned to each pair of bin boundaries will only loosely represent cloud types originally defined from morphological features seen by surface observers. Previously we noted that continental MCSs often include thick anvils (Cetrone and Houze, 2009;Yuan et al, 2011), but we can not identify whether those anvils are classified as Cs show that similar MODIS joint histograms can have a variety of cloud vertical structures (Oreopoulos et al 2017, submitted to J. Geophys. Res.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Cloud Type Classificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This classification is, strictly speaking, based on arbitrary τ and p c thresholds, and clouds assigned to each pair of bin boundaries will only loosely represent cloud types originally defined from morphological features seen by surface observers. Previously we noted that continental MCSs often include thick anvils (Cetrone and Houze, 2009;Yuan et al, 2011), but we can not identify whether those anvils are classified as Cs show that similar MODIS joint histograms can have a variety of cloud vertical structures (Oreopoulos et al 2017, submitted to J. Geophys. Res.…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Cloud Type Classificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…12 bottom). Yuan et al (2011) regarded MCS anvils near the rain core as young anvils. They found these young anvils to have a broader distribution of reflectivity compared to the ones located far away from the raining area (old anvils), which is consistent with our results when comparing the anvils in the developing-mature stages (associated with younger anvils) and dissipating stage (associated with older anvils).…”
Section: Microphysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite-based radar data is very useful for regions that have limited groundbased radar network such as the Maritime Continent of Indonesia. Yuan et al (2011) studied the vertical structure of MCSs by using data from the Cloud Profiling Radar onboard CloudSat in the A-train constellation to investigate the microphysics of cloud anvils in MCSs. As the distance from the rain core was used as the proxy of the age of anvil, the study only captured the MCS life stage for the mature stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be an indicator of the meteorological conditions, (thermo-)dynamical and micro-physical processes, in which a cloud forms (e.g., Yin et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2011;Luo et al, 2009). Further, the cloud vertical distribution affects radiative and latent heating fluxes, which in turn, affect the largescale atmospheric circulation and precipitation processes (e.g., Wang and Rossow, 1998;Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%