2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2009.5441513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very low amplitude ripple SAW filter for infrastructure systems using 41°Y-X lithium niobate: Full FEM/BEM design approach

Abstract: High data rate communication devices demand high relative bandwidth and therefore wide band filters are necessary. In infrastructure systems like base stations and microwave radiolinks, such filtering function was carried out by ceramic filter technology. They were preferred for their low in-band ripple and VSWR necessary for low EVM and amplifier linearity. We have developed a design technique allowing SAW devices to advantageously replace ceramic filters in many systems.One important parameter that determine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models encompass the impulse model [5], equivalent circuit models [6], the coupling-of-modes (COM) model [7], the P-matrix model [8], and the scattering matrix approach [9]. In addition to these models, finite element methods (FEMs) [10,11] and boundary element methods (BEMs) [12][13][14] are also extensively employed for the analysis of SAW devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models encompass the impulse model [5], equivalent circuit models [6], the coupling-of-modes (COM) model [7], the P-matrix model [8], and the scattering matrix approach [9]. In addition to these models, finite element methods (FEMs) [10,11] and boundary element methods (BEMs) [12][13][14] are also extensively employed for the analysis of SAW devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…impulse model [5], equivalent circuit models [6], the coupling-of-modes (COM) model [7], the P-matrix model [8], and the scattering matrix approach [9]. In addition to these models, finite element methods (FEMs) [10,11] and boundary element methods (BEMs) [12][13][14] are also extensively employed for the analysis of SAW devices. The finite element method (FEM) offers unique advantages in simulations, including its capability to model spurious modes [15], nonlinear effects [16], and SAW devices with complex geometries [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%