1999
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.174790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victims' Rights: Rethinking Our 'Adversary System'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the criminal justice system in America has largely recognized the rights of the defendant in all criminal proceedings (Blondel, 2008), with apparent lack of recognition for the rights of crime victims (Kyl et al, 2005). Victims’ rights advocates argue that the rights of victims of crime must be recognized during criminal proceedings, because these individuals have a unique interest in such proceedings (Cassell, 2009; Pizzi, 1999), and have heavily criticized this behavior of the system. The major concern of the advocates is that victims of violent or non-violent criminal acts have a stake in the criminal proceedings that is different from that of the public or non-victims.…”
Section: Historical Analysis Of Federal Victims’ Rights Legislation Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the criminal justice system in America has largely recognized the rights of the defendant in all criminal proceedings (Blondel, 2008), with apparent lack of recognition for the rights of crime victims (Kyl et al, 2005). Victims’ rights advocates argue that the rights of victims of crime must be recognized during criminal proceedings, because these individuals have a unique interest in such proceedings (Cassell, 2009; Pizzi, 1999), and have heavily criticized this behavior of the system. The major concern of the advocates is that victims of violent or non-violent criminal acts have a stake in the criminal proceedings that is different from that of the public or non-victims.…”
Section: Historical Analysis Of Federal Victims’ Rights Legislation Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents Proponents of a federal victims’ rights amendment often base their arguments on concerns regarding the victim’s position in the criminal justice system, positing that without a federal amendment, victims’ rights will remain inferior to those of defendants (Barajas and Nelson 1997; Cellini 1997). An amendment would provide both a formal and symbolic acknowledgment of victims’ legitimate role in the criminal justice system, forcing the adversarial system to be reconsidered in a new light (Pizzi 1999). Proponents argued that a federal amendment would extend victims’ rights without interfering with the rights of the defendant (Barajas and Nelson 1997; Pizzi 1999; Twist 1999) or without resulting in an excessive financial burden (Barajas and Nelson 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An amendment would provide both a formal and symbolic acknowledgment of victims’ legitimate role in the criminal justice system, forcing the adversarial system to be reconsidered in a new light (Pizzi 1999). Proponents argued that a federal amendment would extend victims’ rights without interfering with the rights of the defendant (Barajas and Nelson 1997; Pizzi 1999; Twist 1999) or without resulting in an excessive financial burden (Barajas and Nelson 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%