2004
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-10-200405180-00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virulence Factors Predict Escherichia coli Colonization Patterns among Human and Animal Household Members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
36
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
10
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies (6,7,12,31), shared strains were distributed more broadly, caused more infections, and exhibited more uropathogenic traits than did nonshared strains. This indicates that certain E. coli traits and lineages promote both UTI pathogenesis and intestinal colonization (32).…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…As in previous studies (6,7,12,31), shared strains were distributed more broadly, caused more infections, and exhibited more uropathogenic traits than did nonshared strains. This indicates that certain E. coli traits and lineages promote both UTI pathogenesis and intestinal colonization (32).…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Several cross-sectional surveys have demonstrated similarities among clinical or fecal E. coli isolates from humans, dogs, and cats with respect to genomic background and virulence-associated accessory traits (virulence factors [VFs]), particularly within serogroups O6 and O4, suggesting possible zoonotic (whether animal-to-human or human-to-animal) transmission (3,5,6,9,11,13,15,16,20,26,(30)(31)(32)(33). Consistent with this possibility, in two longitudinal surveillance studies involving the E. coli flora of human household members and their canine or feline pets, pets were found to be intermittently colonized with the same virulent-appearing E. coli clones that colonized multiple humans and caused acute cystitis in the women (8,22).However, these studies examined only modest numbers of isolates and accessory traits and/or relied on somewhat imprecise phylogenetic methods such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, outer membrane protein profiling, or random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (3,5,6,8,9,11,13,15,16,20,22,26,(30)(31)(32)(33). Accordingly, they leave uncertainty as to the extent of commonality among human-and pet-derived E. coli isolates.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…This represents an interesting counterpoint to previously documented UTI episodes caused in humans by E. coli strains that colonized the family's dog or cat (6,13,24). These findings suggest that UTI may sometimes be a zoonosis in either direction (human to pet or pet to human).…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In E. coli UTI, the immediate source of the causative strain is usually the host's own fecal flora (4,9,23,30). Household members, including pets, commonly share E. coli clones, suggesting within-household transmission (2,3,5,6,13,24). Although pets sometimes carry ExPEC clones that cause UTI in human household members (6,13,24), the reverse scenario has not been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%