1992
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.117.2.248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus Transmission by Aphis gossypii Glover to Aphid-resistant and Susceptible Muskmelons

Abstract: The spread of watermelon mosaic virus by the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) was 31%, 74%, and 71% less to a melon aphid-resistant muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) breeding line than to the susceptible recurrent parent in a field cage study. Aphid-resistant and susceptible plants served equally well as the virus source. The highest rate of infection (97.9%) was noted when target plants were all melon-aphid susceptible, least (26.7%) when the target p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of repetitions and recording duration were both in the low range of standard EPG experiments, and the positive results obtained may be due to the rapid access to phloem vessels by A. gossypii (often less than 30 min on susceptible plants). The resistance sources studied by the two groups are likely to be related, as shown by the genetic (Pitrat & Lecoq, 1982) and viral transmission data mentioned above (Kishaba et al, 1992). Access to phloem, in terms of frequency and time within a penetration, did not seem to be altered by the presence of the Vat gene, precluding the presence of physical barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of repetitions and recording duration were both in the low range of standard EPG experiments, and the positive results obtained may be due to the rapid access to phloem vessels by A. gossypii (often less than 30 min on susceptible plants). The resistance sources studied by the two groups are likely to be related, as shown by the genetic (Pitrat & Lecoq, 1982) and viral transmission data mentioned above (Kishaba et al, 1992). Access to phloem, in terms of frequency and time within a penetration, did not seem to be altered by the presence of the Vat gene, precluding the presence of physical barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, these authors showed that the branching pat-tern of stylet sheaths was different on resistant plants (higher branching), and that ingestion from sieve cells was shorter on these plants (8 min on R, 29 min on S, not statistically significant), and concluded that the 'resistance factor(s) interferes with ingestion from sieve cells'. The resistance sources studied by the two groups are likely to be related, as shown by the genetic (Pitrat & Lecoq, 1982) and viral transmission data mentioned above (Kishaba et al, 1992). No comparative information is available for other melon resistance to A. gossypii (Shinoda, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resistance appears to be to A. gossypii only, not to other aphid species such as Myzus persicae . The resistance to A. gossypii appears to be due to antibiosis and antixenosis responses (Kennedy et al, 1978;Kishaba et al, 1992;Lecoq et al, 1980), whereas the inhibition of the ability to transmit non-persistent viruses operates at the inoculation phase. Certainly, the mechanism of resistance does not interfere with virus acquisition, since it has been shown that A. gossypii efficiently acquires virus particles when probing on resistant source plants .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual economic value of aphid‐resistant cultivars in US alfalfa and sorghum production alone is conservatively estimated to be more than $US 400 million . In addition, aphid‐resistant cultivars have been repeatedly shown to slow the spread of aphid‐vectored viruses …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%