2001
DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200110000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the test, the subjects were instructed to adjust their breathing and relax while sitting for 10 min [26] and stabilizing their emotions to ensure the accuracy of experimental data collected. They took the subjective scale test first and then the subjects completed a self-rated psychological measurement twice using 100 mm Visual Analog Scales (VAS) [27]. Participants were asked to label the line with their current subjective evaluation and were evaluated on six aspects of alertness, flexibility, comfort, excitement, pain and fatigue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the test, the subjects were instructed to adjust their breathing and relax while sitting for 10 min [26] and stabilizing their emotions to ensure the accuracy of experimental data collected. They took the subjective scale test first and then the subjects completed a self-rated psychological measurement twice using 100 mm Visual Analog Scales (VAS) [27]. Participants were asked to label the line with their current subjective evaluation and were evaluated on six aspects of alertness, flexibility, comfort, excitement, pain and fatigue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective assessment (the patient’s perception of hair loss severity) of the 125 first-visit patients and a comparison between the assessment results prior to and following treatment were conducted using a VAS (8,12,14–16) in which the patient’s evaluation was scored from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 100 (completely satisfied). The VAS is a simple tool for measuring the satisfaction of the patients regarding the state of their hair loss and the effect of the treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Our study utilized two reliable self-reported measures of functioning and pain adaptation, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) 24 and the Quadruple Visual Analog Scale (QVAS). 25 Second, research has suggested that clinically meaningful improvement requires a minimum of 30% change from baseline on pain using the QVAS, and on functioning using the RMDQ. 26 Third, Myers et al 27 recently reported that higher expectations for recovery were associated with greater functional improvement.…”
Section: Research Design and Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%