Visualizing Bibliometric Networks

Eck, Nees Jan van; Waltman, Ludo

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

Cited by 1,929 publications

(1,544 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,167

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Em síntese, dois autores (ou duas publicações) são ditos(as) cocitados(as) quando existe um(a) terceiro(a) que os(as) cita conjuntamente. Desta forma, quanto maior o número de documentos em que dois autores (ou duas publicações) são co-citados(as), mais forte será a relação de co-citação entre estes(as) (van Eck & Waltman, 2014 …”

Section: Redes De Co-citaçãounclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mapeando a Produção Científica Internacional Sobre Inovação Aberta

Lima¹,

Leocádio²

2018

Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Redes De Co-citaçãounclassified

“…A relação de co-ocorrência entre duas palavras-chave é determinada pelo número de artigos em uma base de documentos em que ambas ocorrem conjuntamente, seja no título, no resumo ou na lista de palavras-chave (van Eck & Waltman, 2014 …”

Section: Redes De Co-ocorrências De Palavras-chaveunclassified

Mapeando a Produção Científica Internacional Sobre Inovação Aberta

Lima¹,

Leocádio²

2018

Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although undoubtedly, one of the contributions that best underlies the basis for the objectives of the present work is the work of Iwami et al (Iwami, Mori, Kajikawa, & Sakata, 2013), who proposed a similar analysis applied to the field of Industrial Engineering literature, with the aim of researchers having a tool on which to focus their research efficiently based on the research at that time. Other contributions have been made in this line, mainly through book chapters (van Eck & Waltman, 2014) or work already focused on the information available to researchers online (Talmale & Singh, 2015). These last three works inspired the methodology used in this proposal, which is based on combining the methodology traditionally used by Iwami and the authors who preceded him and adding the treatment of qualitative information obtained online, according to the specifications of Talmale and Singh.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The usefulness of social media analysis within scholarly publications: a study of first-tier tourism journals

Peláez-Verdet

Ferrera-Blasco

2017

TMs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La utilidad del análisis de redes sociales en las publicaciones académicas: un estudio de las revistas de turismo del primer cuartil Antonio Peláez-VerdetUniversidad de Málaga, Facultad de Turismo, C/ Leon Tolstoi, 4, Despacho 12, 29071, Málaga, Spain, apv@uma.es Manuel Ferrera-BlascoUniversidad de Málaga, Facultad de Turismo, C/ Leon Tolstoi, 4, Despacho 12, 29071, Málaga, Spain, manuelferrera@uma.es AbstractThe introduction of social network techniques in scholarly research analysis has driven a better understanding of the main authors and their debates. These tools have improved the traditional bibliographic models considerably. The present analysis applied the centrality indicators from social network analysis to first-tier journal articles (index: Journal Citation Reports (SSE)). The results revealed that journal specialization within the tourism theme is consistently in line with their editorial line, with minor issues detected. When it comes to academic debate, however, the topics are not concentrated homogenously. The authors at the center of the debate are not always the most prolific, yet it turns out that co-authoring helps them to gain central positions within the debate.Keywords: Social media, tourism, first-tier journals, author networks, literature review. ResumenEn el análisis de la literatura científica, los principales autores y sus debates han podido analizarse mejor desde que se han importado las técnicas de análisis de redes sociales, que mejoran las herramientas de bibliometría tradicionales. Este análisis ha aplicado los indicadores de centralidad del análisis de redes sociales a los artículos de investigación publicados en revistas de turismo de primer cuartil del Journal Citation Reports (SSE). Los resultados revelan que la especialización de las revistas, aún dentro de la temática del turismo, responde a sus líneas editoriales con algunos matices, aunque las inclinaciones en cuanto al análisis de las materias turísticas no se distribuyen de manera tan homogénea. Los autores que ocupan el centro del debate académico no siempre coinciden con los más prolíficos, aunque podría decirse que la coautoría ayuda a los autores a posicionarse en el centro de la discusión.Palabras clave: Redes sociales, turismo, revistas de primer cuartil, redes de autores, revisión de la literatura.

show abstract

“…Bibliometric maps are a form of representation of scientific networks (van Eck and Waltman 2014) used in Scientometrics as a means to understand connections between researchers and their work. They are based on three main elements: statistical analysis of written publications (often including text and data mining); different methods of visualisation (distance-based, graph-based and timeline-based) and digital tools supporting analysis and visualisation.…”

Section: Second Phase: Bibliometric Maps Production and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Different views on Digital Scholarship: separate worlds or cohesive research field?

Raffaghelli

Cucchiara

Manganello

et al. 2016

Research in Learning Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a systematic review of the literature on Digital Scholarship, aimed at better understanding the collocation of this research area at the crossroad of several disciplines and strands of research. The authors analysed 45 articles in order to draw a picture of research in this area. In the first phase, the articles were classified, and relevant quantitative and qualitative data were analysed. Results showed that three clear strands of research do exist: Digital Libraries, Networked Scholarship and Digital Humanities. Moreover, researchers involved in this research area tackle the problems related to technological uptake in the scholar's profession from different points of view, and define the field in different Á often complementary Á ways, thus generating the perception of a research area still in need of a unifying vision. In the second phase, authors searched for evidence of the disciplinary contributions and interdisciplinary cohesion of research carried out in this area through the use of bibliometric maps. Results suggest that the area of Digital Scholarship, still in its infancy, is advancing in a rather fragmented way, shaping itself around the above-mentioned strands, each with its own research agenda. However, results from the cross-citation analysis suggest that the Networked Scholarship strand is more cohesive than the others in terms of cross-citations.

show abstract

Visualizing Bibliometric Networks

Cited by 1,929 publications

References 47 publications

Mapeando a Produção Científica Internacional Sobre Inovação Aberta

Mapeando a Produção Científica Internacional Sobre Inovação Aberta

The usefulness of social media analysis within scholarly publications: a study of first-tier tourism journals

Different views on Digital Scholarship: separate worlds or cohesive research field?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About