2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visually Guided Behavior and Optogenetically Induced Learning in Head-Fixed Flies Exploring a Virtual Landscape

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to pre-stimulus epochs, overall behavioral responses displayed an initial period of slowing (spanning from 0 to 120ms after stimulus offset), followed by increased turning (120ms to 280ms) ( Figure 3E). These dynamics are consistent with known local search behaviors (Haberkern et al 2019;Corfas et al 2019). Despite these population-level patterns, we noted a surprising amount of behavioral heterogeneity amongst optogenetically activated flies, such that the behavior of some optogenetically activated flies overlapped with that of controls ( Figure 3F; Figure S3G).…”
Section: Detecting Behavioral Changes Due To Optogenetic Manipulationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to pre-stimulus epochs, overall behavioral responses displayed an initial period of slowing (spanning from 0 to 120ms after stimulus offset), followed by increased turning (120ms to 280ms) ( Figure 3E). These dynamics are consistent with known local search behaviors (Haberkern et al 2019;Corfas et al 2019). Despite these population-level patterns, we noted a surprising amount of behavioral heterogeneity amongst optogenetically activated flies, such that the behavior of some optogenetically activated flies overlapped with that of controls ( Figure 3F; Figure S3G).…”
Section: Detecting Behavioral Changes Due To Optogenetic Manipulationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Briefly, this method treats spaces and their component points as a set of landmarks for pairwise comparison. To do so, pairs of behavior spaces are scaled to be similar sizes then shifted and rotated to possess the same position and orientation in space 18 . The distance between corresponding points in the two adjusted landmark sets is then calculated using Procrustes distance (reported here as Root Mean Square Error; RMSE).…”
Section: Analyzing Correlated Random Walk Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial learning has been studied in tethered flies moving on a treadmill in two-dimensional environments filled with geometrical objects projected on a visual display (14). The same technology has been used to record the neural activity of mice exploring a virtual space (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to use memory to return to specific locations for foraging is advantageous for survival. Although recent reports have demonstrated that the fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster are capable of visual cue-driven place learning and idiothetic path integration [1][2][3][4], the depth and flexibility of Drosophila's ability to solve spatial tasks and the underlying neural substrate and genetic basis have not been extensively explored. Here, we show that Drosophila can remember a reward-baited location through reinforcement learning and do so quickly and without requiring vision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%