1970
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/23.5.520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin C Status of Cigarette Smokers an Nonsmokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
23
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to expectation (Pelletier, 1970;Hume & Weyers, 1973), there was no evidence that either infections or current smoking had contributed to the low vitamin C values in lung-cancer patients. Leucocyte counts did not correlate inversely with vitamin C values, and the latter were not lower in patients with recent infections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Contrary to expectation (Pelletier, 1970;Hume & Weyers, 1973), there was no evidence that either infections or current smoking had contributed to the low vitamin C values in lung-cancer patients. Leucocyte counts did not correlate inversely with vitamin C values, and the latter were not lower in patients with recent infections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…This effect, however, is complicated by the number of moderate to heavy smokers found in the low group. The data showing that smokers had lower levels of plasma vitamin C than non-smokers replicates previous findings (12,13). In addition, the present findings indicate that vitamin supplementation involving 75 mg of vitamin C a day does not ameliorate this condition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Research has also shown that smokers have low levels of vitamin C (12,13). A possible explanation for this effect is that smokers absorb less vitamin C from the gut than non-smokers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in dietary habits between the young and elderly should be considered for the decline in vitamin C concentration with age. Burr et al (1974) and Pelletier (1975) have found that differences between males and females exist where subjects have been matched for dietary intake. Morgan et al (1955) have observed that females maintained higher serum levels of vitamin C on lower intakes than males.…”
Section: Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan et al (1955), Brook and Grimshaw (1968), Burr et al (1974), Pelletier (1975), Attwood et al (1978) and Bates et al (1979) have reported that the value of vitamin C in plasma and leukocytes is higher in females than in males, and the difference persists into old age. Loh and Wilson (1971) have shown that below the age of 60, the females have higher ascorbic acid values than the males, but after this age, the male concentrations exceed those in females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%