2014
DOI: 10.4000/geomorphologie.10588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitesses et modalités de recul des falaises crayeuses de Haute-Normandie (France) : méthodologie et variabilité du recul

Abstract: Les falaises de Haute-Normandie connaissent une intense dynamique régressive qui a surtout été étudiée à travers le suivi du haut de falaise. La comparaison de l'orthophotographie de 2008 (BD Ortho ® , IGN) avec l'analyse photogrammétrique initiale (1966-1995Costa, 2000) fournit des résultats sur une période plus longue (1966-2008, soit 42 ans). Ces vitesses ont été calculées tous les 50 m pour mettre en évidence des phénomènes de grande échelle, notamment l'influence des obstacles comme les éboulements/écroul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Located at the northwestern end of the sedimentary Paris Basin, Upper Normandy coastal chalk cliffs consist of Upper Cretaceous chalk (from the Cenomanian to Campanian stages) (Figure ). These cliffs recede with an average retreat rate of 0.15 m/yr but with a high spatial variability (0.23 m/yr between Saint‐Valery‐en‐Caux and Dieppe (Costa et al ., , ; Letortu et al ., )). These values are not representative of rock dynamics because, in reality, retreat occurs in jerks (rock falls).…”
Section: Climate and Rock Fall Database Along The Studied Coastlinementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Located at the northwestern end of the sedimentary Paris Basin, Upper Normandy coastal chalk cliffs consist of Upper Cretaceous chalk (from the Cenomanian to Campanian stages) (Figure ). These cliffs recede with an average retreat rate of 0.15 m/yr but with a high spatial variability (0.23 m/yr between Saint‐Valery‐en‐Caux and Dieppe (Costa et al ., , ; Letortu et al ., )). These values are not representative of rock dynamics because, in reality, retreat occurs in jerks (rock falls).…”
Section: Climate and Rock Fall Database Along The Studied Coastlinementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The shore platform would have to have developed landwards at an average rate of 17.0 ± 1.2 mm/yr to bevel the carbonate platform to its currently exposed width, assuming that planation spanned the time between the early Pliocene tilting event and the burial of quartz‐bearing sediment into the caves. Such a rate is consistent with modern measurements of 18–35 mm/yr sea cliff retreat rates in similarly poorly consolidated carbonates [e.g., Dornbusch et al ., ; Letortu et al ., ] and 14.3 mm/yr in flysh [ De Lange and Moon , 2005]. Beveling of the volcanoclastic basement could require more time, as reported rates of long‐term cliff retreat in volcanic rocks are generally lower (0.6–1.7 mm/yr [ Smoot , ; Mitchell et al , ]).…”
Section: Knickpoint Initiation and Retreatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the large tidal range, the wide platform and the dry valley offering an easy access to the foreshore, the entire cliff face can be observed from the foreshore (Figure 1b). According to the surveys of the cliff top evolution on vertical aerial photographs (1966-2008, [25]) and of the cliff face evolution by terrestrial laser scanning (2010-2017, [26]), the erosion value is of 0.36 m/year. Both layers (chalk and Tertiary strata) are prone to erosion, which explains the high annual retreat rate in this area, in comparison with average regional retreat rate (0.15 m/year from Cap d'Antifer to Le Tréport, 1966-2008 [25]).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the surveys of the cliff top evolution on vertical aerial photographs (1966-2008, [25]) and of the cliff face evolution by terrestrial laser scanning (2010-2017, [26]), the erosion value is of 0.36 m/year. Both layers (chalk and Tertiary strata) are prone to erosion, which explains the high annual retreat rate in this area, in comparison with average regional retreat rate (0.15 m/year from Cap d'Antifer to Le Tréport, 1966-2008 [25]). The modalities of erosion include rock falls (large-scale movements affecting all or part of the cliff face) and debris falls (very small blocks or flakes (up to a decimeter scale) falling from across the cliff face) [27].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%