1999
DOI: 10.1109/78.796442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI configurable delay commutator for a pipeline split radix FFT architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining the features of the R2 SDF and the R4MDC approaches, the proposed FFT architecture not only can implement the radix-8 FFT algorithm in a 128-point FFT to reduce the number of complex multiplications but also can provide four times the throughput rate, compared with the R2 SDF scheme, as listed in Table III. In addition, the numbers of register excluding the input buffer and complex multiplier used in our scheme are only 38.9% and 44.8% of those in the SRMDC architecture [7]. Although the number of complex adders in our design is greater than that in the others, the cost of complex adders is much less than that of registers and complex multipliers, respectively.…”
Section: B Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By combining the features of the R2 SDF and the R4MDC approaches, the proposed FFT architecture not only can implement the radix-8 FFT algorithm in a 128-point FFT to reduce the number of complex multiplications but also can provide four times the throughput rate, compared with the R2 SDF scheme, as listed in Table III. In addition, the numbers of register excluding the input buffer and complex multiplier used in our scheme are only 38.9% and 44.8% of those in the SRMDC architecture [7]. Although the number of complex adders in our design is greater than that in the others, the cost of complex adders is much less than that of registers and complex multipliers, respectively.…”
Section: B Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Unfortunately, the traditional R2 (Radix-2) MDC architecture cannot provide the available throughput rate unless it raises the work frequency [6]; the R4 (Radix-4) MDC architecture, which needs a power of four, has the limitation on FFT size [6], and the Split-Radix (SR) MDC has higher hardware cost [7]. In addition, the higher radix FFT algorithm is difficult to be implemented in the traditional MDC architecture.…”
Section: Design Issue Of the Fft Processor For The Ofdm-based Uwbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pipeline based split-radix FFT architecture has been developed [1] for improving the combinational and sequential delay. This article presents a full custom one-bit slice delay commutator design for pipeline split-radix FFT (SRFFT) architecture.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the classical R2MDC architecture does not provide a high processing capability unless its operation frequency is adequately increased 5 ; the R4MDC architecture has the limitation of processing only sequences having lengths equal to an integer power of 4, and the SRMDC architecture has a higher hardware cost 8 . In adition it is difficult to implement algorithms with higher radix using the classical Multi-path architecture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%