39th ARFTG Conference Digest 1992
DOI: 10.1109/arftg.1992.326976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VNA S11 Uncertainty Measurement a Comparison of Three Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The noise floor along with the calibration procedure determine the test port characteristics of directivity, source match, and load match. These measurement system characteristics are uncertainties which can be propagated to determine the overall S11 magnitude and phase uncertainty for a given measurement frequency and S11 magnitude [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: A S11 Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The noise floor along with the calibration procedure determine the test port characteristics of directivity, source match, and load match. These measurement system characteristics are uncertainties which can be propagated to determine the overall S11 magnitude and phase uncertainty for a given measurement frequency and S11 magnitude [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: A S11 Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, a multipath Rician fading channel model, which is designed for line-of-sight communication purposes, is used rather than an additive white or colored noise model. The reason for this is that white noise is more representative of the receiver noise, which is already accounted for in the S11 uncertainty analysis of the previous section, than background reflections [3]. When it comes to colored noise, Brownian noise has been previously used in chipless RFID Monte Carlo simulations to mimic the effects of tag movement [6].…”
Section: B Clutter Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods of verification are known. In [3] the author performed a comparison of several methods. These methods use precision transmission lines and may be applied in the absence of a reference calibration kit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic idea of verification is testing of standards (other than calibration standards) with known (or designed) frequency properties [1]- [3]. Several methods of verification are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of workhorse instruments which enable relatively precise and traceable measurements; impedance analysers (IAs) for RF measurements and vector network analysers (VNAs) for microwave measurements. Although VNAs offer broadband measurements up to at least 110 GHz, their accuracy is limited and depending on the frequency range of operation, it can vary from 1-10% [40]. In contrast, the IAs are limited in frequency range, typically 40 Hz to 110 MHz, but can be precise and accurate (to around 0.1-1% depending on the frequency range) if they are first calibrated using impedance standards of known frequency respons [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%