2020
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2020.3004924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Imagery vs Intention: Viability of Vocal-Based EEG-BCI Paradigms

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study shows that a new system dimension controls the categories of people with speech problems and with ordinary people to assist them in everyday life by humming [44]. This article revealed the feasibility of EEG in BCI with vocal Imagery and vocal Intention.…”
Section: Eeg Application In Bcimentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A recent study shows that a new system dimension controls the categories of people with speech problems and with ordinary people to assist them in everyday life by humming [44]. This article revealed the feasibility of EEG in BCI with vocal Imagery and vocal Intention.…”
Section: Eeg Application In Bcimentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These commands are applied to various applications such as mental spellers (Hwang et al, 2012;Lim et al, 2015;Speier et al, 2017), assistive technology for patients (Hwang et al, 2017;Lim et al, 2017), and online home appliance control (Park et al, 2020). EEG-based BCIs can be classified based on the paradigms to elicit neural activities (Hwang et al, 2013) as motor imagery (MI)-based BCI (Acqualagna et al, 2016;León et al, 2020), visual P300-based BCI (Gu et al, 2019), steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCI, non-motor mental imagery-based BCI (Kristensen et al, 2020), auditory BCI (Kim et al, 2011;Simon et al, 2015), and hybrid BCI (Jalilpour et al, 2020). Among these, SSVEP-based BCIs have the advantage of higher accuracy and higher information transfer rate (ITR) and generally require no/short training time (Tello et al, 2014;Nakanishi et al, 2015;Hwang et al, 2017;Xing et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances have led to notable success in improving language content decoding directly from EEG. For example, the neural correlates of vowels, consonants, phonemes, syllables, and even words have been classified using advanced decoding algorithms [19], [20]. Despite the promising results achieved to date, EEG-based speech imagery decoding is still a potential field because it has several limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%