2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(02)00187-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voids formation in TMC processed by fibre coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in zones near the upper surface, fiber damage is always produced by elevated pressure as previously shown [11]. Fissures can be produced both in the carbon protective coating and the fiber core, as has been previously shown and discussed [2,7,14]. If a pressure of 100 MPa is applied during densification, the fibers are not bent or broken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in zones near the upper surface, fiber damage is always produced by elevated pressure as previously shown [11]. Fissures can be produced both in the carbon protective coating and the fiber core, as has been previously shown and discussed [2,7,14]. If a pressure of 100 MPa is applied during densification, the fibers are not bent or broken.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this case, the voids formation can be explained based on difference in thermal expansion produced between matrix and TiC phases. In agreements with this, Dudek et al [2] explained the voids formation (porosity in reaction zone) based on the volume contraction produced by chemical reaction on the interfacial zones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Choo et al 3 show that in transverse direction, particularly, the matrix and the fiber expand independently over the whole temperature range, indicating that the thermal load is not shared. Dudek et al 17 explain the voids formation (porosity in reaction zone) based only on the volume contraction produced by chemical reaction on the interfacial zones. In our manufacturing conditions, the porosity cannot be attributed to volume contraction (chemical reaction) or differences in thermal expansion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%