2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessment of wild fish population to heavy metals in military training area: Synthesis of a framework with example from Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It's average in the soil was 6.4 mg/kg (Table 4) which is higher than the background value for it in the earth crust, which is 1.8 mg/kg (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee, 2007), the highest concentration was in the industrial areas in the site of S6 represented by Technical Institute workshop which attacked by Military operations (Dvorak et al, 2020), while the sites S2, S3, and S4, may be resulted by industrial waste product from repairing workshops (Thornton, 1996), but in the commercial area was its highest concentration in the site S8 and this is also due to the military operation because it represents the Deanship of the Technical Institute in the northeast of the town (Fig. 2) while the site S14 was related to the heavy traffic because it represents the bus station area in the south the town (Nannoni et al, 2011), and the highest concentration of arsenic in residential areas was at the sites S15 and S21 may be related to the military operations at site S15, while site S21 may be due to the use of pesticides (Thornton, 1996), generally the arsenic in the industrial, commercial and residential areas was relatively high, and this explains the role of military operations.…”
Section: Arsenic (As)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It's average in the soil was 6.4 mg/kg (Table 4) which is higher than the background value for it in the earth crust, which is 1.8 mg/kg (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee, 2007), the highest concentration was in the industrial areas in the site of S6 represented by Technical Institute workshop which attacked by Military operations (Dvorak et al, 2020), while the sites S2, S3, and S4, may be resulted by industrial waste product from repairing workshops (Thornton, 1996), but in the commercial area was its highest concentration in the site S8 and this is also due to the military operation because it represents the Deanship of the Technical Institute in the northeast of the town (Fig. 2) while the site S14 was related to the heavy traffic because it represents the bus station area in the south the town (Nannoni et al, 2011), and the highest concentration of arsenic in residential areas was at the sites S15 and S21 may be related to the military operations at site S15, while site S21 may be due to the use of pesticides (Thornton, 1996), generally the arsenic in the industrial, commercial and residential areas was relatively high, and this explains the role of military operations.…”
Section: Arsenic (As)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For the same site, the results may also differ, e.g., a meta assessment from China targeting five ranges showed that the contamination by Pb and to a lower extent other PTEs such as Cu, Hg and Sb can cause various potential ecological risks at all the surveyed ranges whereas only Pb at three out of five ranges leads to possible health risks [153]. It should also be noted that most studies in the literature on military-impacted areas have focused on the human health risk assessment; however, there is evidence that ecological risks can also be significant, e.g., as recently suggested by Dvorak et al [154] for a military training area in the Czech Republic regarding the accumulation of Hg, Cd, and Pb in wild fish.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Of Military-impacted Sitesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Heavy metals released into the ecosystem from geogenic and anthropogenic (mining, agrochemicals, and industrial effluents) activities are the alternative water pollution Devorak et al [ 17 ]. Rehman et al [ 18 ] said that the probably dangerous detail contaminations ultimately affect human beings through the ingestion of diseased water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%