Untitled

Robiner, William N.; Bearman, Diane L.; Berman, Micah L.; Grove, William M.; Colón, Eduardo A.; Armstrong, Joann; Mareck, Susan; Tanenbaum, Robert L.

doi:10.1023/a:1025419114038

Cited by 15 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite these milestones and other initiatives, stakeholders, including psychologists, question the appropriateness and ponder the benefits, challenges, impact, and necessity of RxP (e.g., Robiner, Tumlin, & Tompkins, 2013; Stuart & Heiby, 2007). McKay (2014) noted a generation of psychologists has been exposed to a preponderance of messages about the virtues of, and relatively little about, the downsides of RxP (Baird, 2007; Fagan, Ax, Liss, Resnick, & Moody, 2007; Robiner et al, 2003, 2002; Sammons, Gorny, Zinner, & Allen, 2000; St. Pierre & Melnyk, 2004; Tompkins & Johnson, 2016; Walters, 2001).…”

Section: | Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prescriptive authority: Psychologists’ abridged training relative to other professions’ training.

Robiner

Tompkins

Hathaway

2020

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Albeit psychologists were granted prescription authority in two states over a decade ago and in three states in recent years, the controversy over prescriptive authority persists within the profession and remains a concern of diverse stakeholders. The literature provides minimal research on the adequacy of psychopharmacology training programs and how commensurate psychologists’ training is with other prescribers’ training. Comparing psychopharmacology training for psychologists to other prescribing professionals’ training reveals psychologists receive fewer didactic training hours in foundational sciences (e.g., biology, chemistry, and pathophysiology) and fewer clinical training hours directly related to prescribing and managing medications. Implications of these findings and legal and regulatory cautions are discussed along with recommendations for future research directions.

show abstract

Section: | Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prescriptive authority: Psychologists’ abridged training relative to other professions’ training.

Robiner

Tompkins

Hathaway

2020

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Os psicólogos estão igualmente divididos nas opiniões sobre adotar ou não essa política (Robiner et al, 2003;Walters, 2001). Os principais argumentos contra a prescrição dos psicólogos são de natureza de treinamento (Robiner et al, 2003).…”

Section: Discussão: Implicações Práticas Para O Psicólogo Clínicounclassified

“…Os principais argumentos contra a prescrição dos psicólogos são de natureza de treinamento (Robiner et al, 2003). Os principais argumentos a favor da prescrição dos psicólogos são de natureza política e em prol da maior eficácia do sistema de saúde americano, uma vez que há uma necessidade muito grande de profissionais que administrem drogas psicoativas em muitas regiões do país.…”

Section: Discussão: Implicações Práticas Para O Psicólogo Clínicounclassified

A neurobiologia da psicopatologia e psicoterapia e as implicações práticas de uma perspectiva materialista na definição de mente

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMOA psicologia passa no momento atual por uma importante mudança de paradigma teórico e conceitual. Essa mudança ficou bastante marcada na década de 90, considerada a "década do cérebro", quando aumentaram significativamente o número de estudos em comportamento que baseavam-se no funcionamento do cérebro. O mainstream das ciências do comportamento retornou à noção monista materialista de que cérebro e comportamento estão intrinsecamente interligados. Essa noção saiu dos laboratórios de pesquisa básica e chegou com força nas pesquisas aplicadas à psicopatologia e à psicoterapia. A presente revisão narrativa tem como principal objetivo traçar um panorama atual desse empreendimento científico, com ênfase nos esforços feitos dentro das áreas da psicopatologia e da psicologia clínica. Ao final, discute-se até que ponto essa mudança de paradigma pode chegar na prática profissional do psicólogo.Palavras-chave psicologia clínica; psicopatologia; neurociências; psiquiatria; neurologia; marcadores biológicos. ABSTRACTPsychology faces nowadays for a major change of theoretical and conceptual paradigm. This change was quite marked in the 90s, which was considered the "decade of the brain" when the number of behavioral studies based on brain functioning significantly increased. The mainstream of the behavioral sciences returned to the monistic materialistic notion that the brain and behavior are inextricably intertwined. This idea came out of basic research laboratories and influenced strongly in applied research in psychopathology and psychotherapy. This narrative review aims to draw up a current view of the scientific enterprise, with emphasis on efforts within the areas of clinical psychology and psychopathology. It is also discussed to what extent this paradigm shift can reach the professional practice of psychology. Keywords

show abstract

Concerns about substandard training for prescription privileges for psychologists

Heiby

2009

J Clin Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Commentary on the Muse and McGrath study (this issue, pp. 96-103) refutes its conclusion that the amount of training for prescription privileges for psychologists (RxP) is equal to or greater than that for psychiatric nurse practitioners and physicians. First, the sample failed to include only training programs for nurses and psychologists that lead to independent prescribing. Second, training was defined by an arbitrary, nonvalidated list of "key content areas" that excluded much of the standard medical curricula for nurses and physicians to prescribe. Third, the levels of training for which the "key content areas" were assessed omitted undergraduate prerequisites, apprenticeships, supervised practice, and residencies that are a standard part of the nursing and physician programs studied. RxP training remains substandard.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 15 publications

References 38 publications

Prescriptive authority: Psychologists’ abridged training relative to other professions’ training.

Prescriptive authority: Psychologists’ abridged training relative to other professions’ training.

A neurobiologia da psicopatologia e psicoterapia e as implicações práticas de uma perspectiva materialista na definição de mente

Concerns about substandard training for prescription privileges for psychologists

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About