2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36018-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. dΛs, see, e.g., [23,Example 1.56]. This coincides a.s. with the more complex integral de nition in [34,38], so we can apply their results on properties of the integral.…”
Section: A Class Of Strong Idt Subordinatorssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…. dΛs, see, e.g., [23,Example 1.56]. This coincides a.s. with the more complex integral de nition in [34,38], so we can apply their results on properties of the integral.…”
Section: A Class Of Strong Idt Subordinatorssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Because of E[z(t)]=0, we have E[da]=0, i.e., the expected change of a is zero. Note that the process is nonnegative if a(0)0 and that a(t)=0 for all future tt0 if a(t0)=0 (for details on the GBM and standard Brownian Motions, see Klenke, , Ch. 21 & 25; Øksendal, , pp.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, if A ∈ A, we have B ⊂ D A . From Dynkins π-λ-Theorem (for details see Klenke [63,Satz 1.19]), it follows that σ(B) = δ(B) ⊂ D A . By the symmetry property of the conditional independence of two sets, this fact can be reformulated as A ⊂ D B for every B ∈ σ(B).…”
Section: Enlargements Of Filtrations and The Martingale Invariance Prmentioning
confidence: 99%