2018
DOI: 10.24326/jasbbx.2018.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wartość rzeźna i jakość mięsa świń ras lokalnych w Polsce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar value of this parameter was noted by Chmiel et al [2012]. The fat content in the tested material was on average 2.82% and was higher than in the pigs tested by Prasow et al [2018], but lower compared to the research by Chmiel et al [2012]. The fat content of meat is an important indicator of its quality.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A similar value of this parameter was noted by Chmiel et al [2012]. The fat content in the tested material was on average 2.82% and was higher than in the pigs tested by Prasow et al [2018], but lower compared to the research by Chmiel et al [2012]. The fat content of meat is an important indicator of its quality.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On this basis, it can be concluded that the results of measuring fat in meat obtained in the tests are good. As for the protein content in the analyzed raw material, it should be noted that its value -20.08% was similar to the results obtained by Pomianowski and Sobotka [2018], while it differed from the results obtained by Chmiel et al [2012] and Prasow et al [2018]. In the latter studies, the percentage of protein in pork ranged between 21.8-24.54%, while in Chmiel et al [2012] was more even and averaged 22%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As reported by Prasow et al [13], compared to Polish Landrace meat, the meat of Pulawska pigs is characterized by darker colour, better pH and water holding capacity (WHC) values, lower drip loss and cooking loss, lower protein and cholesterol content, and higher intramuscular fat content. Today, there is little scientific information available concerning the characteristics of offal obtained from these breeds [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%