2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water supply sustainability and adaptation strategies under anthropogenic and climatic changes of a meso-scale Mediterranean catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies identify and quantify adaptive capacity in social-ecological resilience at different scales based on the quantitative assessment of focal control variables within a certain safe space (Pelling and High, 2005;Rockström et al, 2014;Steffen et al, 2015). Specifically, in order to identify a safe operating space for humanity on Earth, different studies present a set of indicators of capacity to adapt to variability and resilience about climate change (Brooks et al, 2005;Engle and Lemos, 2010;Falloon and Betts, 2010;Hobson and Niemeyer, 2011;García-López and Allué, 2011), coastal communities (Maldonado and Moreno-Sánchez, 2014;Aguilera et al, 2015), and water resource system (Eakin et al, 2010;Rockström et al, 2014;Collet et al, 2015). The theory is well developed in terms of resilience thinking, however, the question of how to evaluate a system's adaptive capacity is still open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies identify and quantify adaptive capacity in social-ecological resilience at different scales based on the quantitative assessment of focal control variables within a certain safe space (Pelling and High, 2005;Rockström et al, 2014;Steffen et al, 2015). Specifically, in order to identify a safe operating space for humanity on Earth, different studies present a set of indicators of capacity to adapt to variability and resilience about climate change (Brooks et al, 2005;Engle and Lemos, 2010;Falloon and Betts, 2010;Hobson and Niemeyer, 2011;García-López and Allué, 2011), coastal communities (Maldonado and Moreno-Sánchez, 2014;Aguilera et al, 2015), and water resource system (Eakin et al, 2010;Rockström et al, 2014;Collet et al, 2015). The theory is well developed in terms of resilience thinking, however, the question of how to evaluate a system's adaptive capacity is still open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, when the metaphorical door is unlocked and opened, it is this wider framing which provides a clearer view of the whole system, one that is accessible to everyone along the breadth axis. For example, modeling the impact of glacier variation on water resources (as in Gao et al, 2018) necessarily excludes the numerous other influences on water resources (e.g., anthropogenic interactions as in Collet et al, 2015). No single method can be expected to “do it all.” Discipline‐specific models are able to navigate Obstacle 2 at the expense of 1, 3, and 4.…”
Section: Four Complexity Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, sustainability and relative sustainability [45,47] were proposed. These indicators have been applied in the evaluation of water resource systems and are two of the most popular [15,45,[49][50][51][52]. We applied these criteria for the proposed indices (Section 2.5.1).…”
Section: Indices Of the Integrated Water Resource Management (Iwrm)mentioning
confidence: 99%