2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.205301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave functions andgfactor of holes in Ge/Si quantum dots

Abstract: We investigate theoretically the Zeeman effect on the hole states in quantum dots. In frame of tight-binding approach, we propose a method of calculating the g factor for localized states. The principal values of the g factor for the ground hole state in the self-assembled Ge/Si quantum dot are calculated. We find the strong g-factor anisotropy-the components g xx , g yy are one order smaller than the g zz component, g zz ϭ12.28, g xx ϭ0.69, g yy ϭ1.59. The efficiency of the developed method is demonstrated by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, similarly to bulk semiconductors and quantum wells, 52,54-56 the magnetic field induced mixing of heavy and light hole states and quantum confinement strongly renormalizes heavy-hole g-factor in quantum dots from its value in the bulk. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Indeed, in the presence of the magnetic field the wavevector k in Eq. (4) is replaced by k + eA(r)/c , where A(r) = (1/2)B × r is the vector potential of the magnetic field.…”
Section: Longitudinal G-factor G H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, similarly to bulk semiconductors and quantum wells, 52,54-56 the magnetic field induced mixing of heavy and light hole states and quantum confinement strongly renormalizes heavy-hole g-factor in quantum dots from its value in the bulk. [57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Indeed, in the presence of the magnetic field the wavevector k in Eq. (4) is replaced by k + eA(r)/c , where A(r) = (1/2)B × r is the vector potential of the magnetic field.…”
Section: Longitudinal G-factor G H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modified magnetic moment also controls the spin dynamics in nanostructures, and is usually parametrized in the literature as a shape, size and composition dependent g tensor defined by μ ¼ g · S, where S represents the electron spin [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Despite the central nature of g tensors to high-speed spin manipulation [12][13][14][15]17,18], spin lifetimes [19,20], and quantum computation [21], the spatial structure of the spin-correlated orbital currents that determine these g tensors has not been investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 In general, the effective mass approximation (EMA) type calculation is inadequate for nanostructures at small sizes ( ≤ 30Å ) because the atomic nature and surface effects become more prominent as the size of the nanostructure decreases. Because of its atomic nature, the tight-binding model is ideal to study the electronic and optical properties of nanostructures in this size range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%