2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight gain of free-ranging beef cattle grazing in the boreal forest of south-eastern Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cows previously identified as phenotypically slow eaters of concentrate have a lower motivation to seek forage, a higher tendency to rest close to water or in sheltered areas than fast eaters [ 86 ]. However, cows of high and low feed efficiency do not differ in the daily distance travelled in steppe rangelands [ 44 ], and no relationship between liveweight gain and home range size or proportion of time spent on summer farm meadows was found in cows grazing on boreal forests [ 87 ]. Cows differing in their phenotypical habit to use hilly terrains graze different parts of the same pasture; “hill climbers” use rougher terrain and begin travelling to water about one hour later than cows previously classified as “bottom dwellers” [ 88 ], showing the degree of asynchrony in the motivation to eat or drink of different individuals [ 37 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Animal Factors and Social Interactions On Site Use Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cows previously identified as phenotypically slow eaters of concentrate have a lower motivation to seek forage, a higher tendency to rest close to water or in sheltered areas than fast eaters [ 86 ]. However, cows of high and low feed efficiency do not differ in the daily distance travelled in steppe rangelands [ 44 ], and no relationship between liveweight gain and home range size or proportion of time spent on summer farm meadows was found in cows grazing on boreal forests [ 87 ]. Cows differing in their phenotypical habit to use hilly terrains graze different parts of the same pasture; “hill climbers” use rougher terrain and begin travelling to water about one hour later than cows previously classified as “bottom dwellers” [ 88 ], showing the degree of asynchrony in the motivation to eat or drink of different individuals [ 37 ].…”
Section: Effect Of Animal Factors and Social Interactions On Site Use Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where livestock grazing might be permitted and productive, such tools should be investigated collaboratively with farmers and other relevant authorities and stakeholders, and adjusted according to site knowledge, scientific monitoring, and management objectives, to determine density-and/or durationbased management plans. We note that seasonal grazing with winter stall feeding indoors may be preferred for practical reasons, but moderate year-round "natural grazing" outdoors (Vermeulen, 2015) is often preferable as densities are naturally regulated by winter food availability, reducing risk of overgrazing typical of seasonal regimes (Goderie et al, 2013;Tofastrud et al, 2020). In relation to diet selection and density effects, we can expect cattle at moderate densities to have limited effect on woody vegetation (Calleja et al, 2019), and short duration, high density "boom and bust" grazing may reduce woody vegetation but compromise livestock health and production (Teruel-Coll et al, 2019).…”
Section: Designing a Sustainable Forest Grazing Management Plan In A Landscape Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, in beef cattle breeding there is a tendency towards a transition from the extreme compact (solid) type with a short and square body on low legs to a type that is larger in live weight and well-defined meat forms [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%