2005
DOI: 10.1145/1055959.1055968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted waypoint mobility model and its impact on ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2], authors proposed to validate some key characteristics of the RWP such as average speed and rest times using real life data. The Weighted Waypoint Model (WWM) [3] is a second attempt to validate a synthetic model which has been tuned by real traces. The WWM adds the notion of preference to the random waypoint.…”
Section: Synthetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], authors proposed to validate some key characteristics of the RWP such as average speed and rest times using real life data. The Weighted Waypoint Model (WWM) [3] is a second attempt to validate a synthetic model which has been tuned by real traces. The WWM adds the notion of preference to the random waypoint.…”
Section: Synthetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the model is to evaluate the effectiveness of wireless communication devices in improving avalanche safety. The weighted waypoint mobility model [10] by Hsu et al describes the pedestrian movement patterns among preferred locations on a campus. The preferred locations are predetermined in the environment and assigned with "weights", which define the probability of being selected as the destination by the pedestrians.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complex rules are introduced to make the nodes follow a popularity distribution when selecting the next destination [12], stay on designated paths for movements [17], or move as a group [11]. These rules enrich the scenarios covered by the synthetic mobility models, but at the same time make theoretical treatment of these models difficult.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal in this paper is, on one hand, to improve the existing random mobility models (e.g., random walk, random direction, etc.) and synthetic mobility models (e.g., [12], [11], [17]) on the front of realism, by considering empirically observed mobility characteristics from the traces [14]. On the other hand, the construction of the model should new model should be simple enough to allow in-depth theoretical analysis, and be flexible enough to have wider applicability than the mobility traces (which provide only a single snapshot of the underlying mobility process) and current trace-based mobility models [33], [23], [22] which focus mainly on matching mobility characteristics with a specific class of traces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%