What economics education is missing: the real world

Abstract

Purpose The global financial crisis led to increasing distrust in economic research and the economics profession, in the process of which the current state of economics and economic education in particular were heavily criticized. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to conduct a study with undergraduate students of economics in order to capture their view of economic education. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on the documentary method, a qualitative empirical method, which combines maximum openness with regard to the collection of empirical material coupled with maximum rigor in analysis. Findings The empirical findings show that students enter economics curricula with epistemic, practical or moral/political motivations for understanding and dealing with real-world problems but end up remarkably disappointed after going through the mathematical and methods-orientated introductory courses. The findings further indicate that students develop strategies to cope with their disappointment – all of them relating to their original motivation. The theoretical contextualization of the empirical findings is based on the psychological concept of cognitive dissonance. Social implications A socially and politically responsible economic education, however, should provide students guidance in understanding current and prospective economic challenges, thereby enabling them to become informed and engaged citizens. Therefore, it is essential that the students’ criticism of the current state of economic education be taken seriously and BA programs reformed accordingly. Originality/value The originality of this paper lies in the application of a qualitative methodology and explicit focus on the student perspective on economics education. The study provides empirical evidence for a lack of real-world orientation in economics education.

Embedding Sustainability Justice in Greek Secondary Curricula through the DeCoRe Plus Methodology

“…Such a merging is very critical at the personal and societal levels because agentic teachers and students pave the way for developing active local/global sustainable citizenship. This type of citizenship brings critical realism and pragmatism to the personal and social transformations necessary to meet the real-life issues found within the 17 Sustainable Development Goals [39,40] that are missing in economics education [41].…”

Evaluating Learning Effectiveness towards Online Learning: Application of Design Thinking and Reading Comprehension for Case Reading on Economic Issues during COVID-19

“…In a dynamic economic environment, why do other conditions remain unchanged? These questions often cause students to misunderstand the definition of terms in economics (Pühringer & Bäuerle, 2019). According to the above motives, this study focuses on the academic practice of online teaching and learning in economics during the COVID-19 crisis.…”

Economic Science, Practice and Education: Interaction Issues

“…В западном общественном дискурсе проблемы высшего экономического образования и преподавания экономической теории обсуждаются очень широко; созданы и функционируют специализированные научные журналы (Journal of Economic Education и другие) форумы и сети (Economics Network, CORE Economics Education и другие). Если до кризиса в литературе и на различных площадках основные темы были связаны со стилем и методами преподавания [1], то мировой экономический кризис 2008-2009 годов заставил обра-титься к проблематике «кризис экономики и кризис экономической теории», то есть акцент сместился с методики преподавания на содержание дисциплины [2]. Главная мысль в дискуссиях последнего десятилетия прослеживается достаточно четко: в университетах и колледжах студенты вместо реальной экономики изучают абстрактную (умозрительную) науку, не имеющую никакого отношения к тем проблемам, которые их волнуют и которые они хотели бы понять (бедность, неравенство, устойчивость, экология, технологические инновации и т.д.)…”