What is necessary and sufficient information for outcome assessment?

Meier, Scott T.; Letsch, Elizabeth A.

doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.4.409

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Overview Of Treatment Outcome Studies1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2000

2008

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite2

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Methodological issues also confound the effectiveness of outcome research. Attrition functions as a moderating variable Treatment Outcomes for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder that could influence the way results can be interpreted and applied (Kazdin, 1994;Meier & Letsch, 2000). Participants who discontinue their involvement in a study tend to differ from participants who remain in the study, and the issue of attrition may generate a bias in posttest and follow-up analysis (Tuckman, 1999).…”

Section: Overview Of Treatment Outcome Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment Outcomes for Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder: A Critical Review

Hill

Beamish

2007

Jour of Counseling & Develop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Counselors in the 21st century must not only respond to the pressures of managed care but also support the best interests of their clients. Criticism from consumers and professionals about the lack of empirical evidence of the efficacy of counseling as well as pressure from managed care companies have prompted a focus on evaluating treatment outcomes. This article provides a framework for developing standards of care by highlighting issues in outcome research in general and by reviewing treatment outcomes for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

show abstract

Section: Overview Of Treatment Outcome Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%