1998
DOI: 10.1075/pbns.58.14zeg
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is “Phatic Communication”?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Los investigadores han caracterizado este objetivo en relación con las funciones del lenguaje de Jakobson ([1960] 1999), las prácticas discursivas (por ejemplo, Laver, 1974(por ejemplo, Laver, , 1975(por ejemplo, Laver, , 1981, la teoría de la relevancia (Padilla Cruz, 2009;Žegarac, 1998). Todos estos enfoques ofrecen una amplia gama de conocimientos sobre el funcionamiento de la comunión fática con un énfasis en la naturaleza universal de la práctica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Los investigadores han caracterizado este objetivo en relación con las funciones del lenguaje de Jakobson ([1960] 1999), las prácticas discursivas (por ejemplo, Laver, 1974(por ejemplo, Laver, , 1975(por ejemplo, Laver, , 1981, la teoría de la relevancia (Padilla Cruz, 2009;Žegarac, 1998). Todos estos enfoques ofrecen una amplia gama de conocimientos sobre el funcionamiento de la comunión fática con un énfasis en la naturaleza universal de la práctica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Although true conversational speech often conveys information about the speaker, we simplify it in this study to be purely phatic, or social in its purpose, containing no information about the robot's intended task [37], [38]. …”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the framework of Relevance Theory (Sperber andWilson, 1986,1995), Nicolle and Clark (1998), Zegarac (1998) and Zegarac and Clark (1999a) have tried to explain why an individual recovers a phatic interpretation of utterances. Like other authors, they also think that the phaticity of utterances is not one of their inherent features but depends on the interpretation that interlocutors make of them.…”
Section: The Extant Relevance-theoretic Approach To Phatic Utterancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, I review the two groups of explanations about why individuáis interpretutterances as phatic. Then, I introduce the extant analysis of phatic utterances based on the pragmatic paradigm of Relevance Theory (Sperber andWilson, 1986, 1995) by Zegarac (1998) and Zegarac and Clark (1999a). Finally, I present the complementary proposal that I have developed which is also based on Relevance Theory (Sperber andWilson, 1986,1995) and the notions of metarepresentation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation