What Participation? Distinguishing Water Monitoring Programs in Mining Regions Based on Community Participation

Abstract

Water issues are a major concern for the mining sector and for communities living near mining operations. Water-related conflicts can damage a firm's social license to operate while violent conflicts pose devastating impacts on community well-being. Collaborative approaches to water management are gaining attention as a proactive solution to prevent conflict. One manifestation of these efforts is participatory water monitoring (PWM). PWM programs have the potential to generate new scientific information on water quantity and quality, improve scientific literacy, generate trust among stakeholders, improve water resource management and ultimately mitigate conflict. The emergence of PWM programs signals a shift toward greater stakeholder collaboration and more inclusive water governance within mining regions. In this article, we propose a new framework to evaluate the degree and extent of community involvement in PWM programs. This framework builds on citizen science literature. When applied to 20 cases in Latin America, notable differences in the degree of community and company participation between PWM programs are found. These differences suggest that companies and communities approach these programs from very different points of view. It is concluded that more attentive collaboration between firms and communities in the design of the program, the collection of data and interpretation of the results is needed to effectively build trust through PWM.

Assessing the Freshwater Quality of a Large-Scale Mining Watershed: The Need for Integrated Approaches

“…Currently, around 44 committees of participatory WQM exist in 11 mining regions of Peru. However, with these practices being restricted to certain locations [59], disparate in points of view [60] and having low academic involvement [61], the WQM soundness debate remains open.…”

Local procurement, shared value, and sustainable development: A case study from the mining sector in Mongolia

“…To address herder concerns about environmental impacts, participatory monitoring programs could form part of the future mine's monitoring of water, pastureland, and land use changes. Participatory monitoring programs involve local people in the design, oversight, execution, and interpretation on environmental data (Pareja et al, 2018) and might also support the co‐creation of mitigation strategies acceptable to both herders and miners. In addition, interview respondents felt that discussion between the company and herders might identify opportunities to bring products, such as raw cashmere, to market at a lower cost to herders.…”

Can our current knowledge and practice allow ecological restoration in the Cerrado?

“…The absence of a clear policy towards periodical evaluation of restoration outcomes is a challenge to be faced (Nunes et al 2016). The absence of regular and consistent monitoring may be related to short-term investments (Le et al 2012) by companies and/or insufficient community involvement (Pareja et al 2018). Short-term monitoring is important for assessing initial outcomes, however, evaluation of restoration progress must also include long-term monitoring (Kollmann et al 2016, Nunes et al 2016).…”