What Shapes the Luminosity Function of Galaxies?

Abstract

We investigate the physical mechanisms that shape the luminosity function. Beginning with the mass function of dark matter halos, we show how gas cooling, photoionization, feedback, merging and thermal conduction affect the shape of the luminosity function. We consider three processes whereby supernovae can affect the forming galaxy: (1) reheating of disk gas to the halo temperature; (2) expansion of the diffuse halo gas; (3) expulsion of cold disk gas from the halo. While feedback of form (1) is able to flatten the faint end of the luminosity function, this alone does not produce the sharp cut-off observed at large luminosities. Feedback of form (2) is also unable to solve this problem. The relative paucity of very bright galaxies can only be explained if cooling in massive halos is strongly suppressed. Conduction is a promising mechanism, but an uncomfortably high efficiency is required to suppress cooling to the desired level. If, instead, superwinds are responsible for the lack of bright galaxies, then the total energy budget required to obtain a good match to the galaxy luminosity function greatly exceeds the energy available from supernova explosions. The mechanism is only viable if the formation of central supermassive black holes play a crucial role in limiting the amount of stars that form in the host galaxy. (abridged)Comment: 10 pages, 5 figures. Submitted to Ap

The abundance and colours of galaxies in high-redshift clusters in the cold dark matter cosmology

“…However, feedback due to supernovae is thought to affect the faint-end slope of the global galaxy luminosity function (e.g. Benson et al 2003). As such, it is possible that reducing the strength of the supernova feedback will reduce the gas content of the galaxies, but will produce an undesirable boost in the faint end of the CGLF above the observations.…”

The Launching of Cold Clouds by Galaxy Outflows. Ii. The Role of Thermal Conduction

“…Such powerful outbursts are well observed in high-surface density galaxies over a wide range of masses and redshifts (e.g., Martin 1999;Pettini et al 2001;Heckman 2002;Veilleux et al 2005), including the ultraluminous infrared galaxies that host as much as half of the z 1 star formation in the universe (Rupke et al 2005). Their impact is extensive: they are believed to set the correlation between galaxy stellar mass and interstellar medium metallicity, (e.g., Tremonti et al 2004;Kewley & Ellison 2008;Mannucci et al 2010), they enrich the intergalactic medium with metals (e.g., Pichon et al 2003;Ferrara et al 2005;Martin et al 2010;Peeples et al 2014;Turner et al 2015), and they help determine the number density of faint galaxies (e.g., Scannapieco et al 2002;Benson et al 2003).…”

Redshift evolution of stellar mass versus gas fraction relation in 0 <z< 2 regime: observational constraint for galaxy formation models

“…It is known that the galaxy formation models based on the canonical cold dark matter hypothesis (the so-called ΛCDM hypothesis) overpredict the number densities of less massive and massive galaxies when compared with the observed SMFs of galaxies (e.g. Benson et al 2003). To resolve this discrepancy, several feedback processes have been proposed to blowout and/or heat up the cold-gas component, which is the raw material for star formation (e.g.…”