1999
DOI: 10.1080/00927879908826771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When every torsion preradical is a torsion radical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if R is a domain and every ideal of R is idempotent, then every F ∈ R-fil is a left Gabriel topology, or equivalently, every T ∈ R-torsp is a hereditary torsion class [7,Theorem 28]. Now suppose that R is a left chain domain whose only proper nonzero ideal is the Jacobson radical J (R).…”
Section: Proof a Cogenerator For σ [M] Is Given Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if R is a domain and every ideal of R is idempotent, then every F ∈ R-fil is a left Gabriel topology, or equivalently, every T ∈ R-torsp is a hereditary torsion class [7,Theorem 28]. Now suppose that R is a left chain domain whose only proper nonzero ideal is the Jacobson radical J (R).…”
Section: Proof a Cogenerator For σ [M] Is Given Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long-standing open problem is the following: what is the structure of a ring for which every left exact preradical is a radical? Van den Berg showed in [16] that such a ring does not have to be right Noetherian or a right V-ring. Dauns and Zhou showed in [5,Proposition 3.7] that right Noetherian rings whose left exact preradicals are radicals are precisely right QI-rings.…”
Section: When Is I M a Radical?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show now that β is subgenerated by a direct sum of strongly prime modules. Let I be the set of all proper nonzero ideals of R. By [13,Proposition 27,p5539] every element of I is completely prime. It follows that R/I is a domain for all I ∈ I.…”
Section: Dusemiprime Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the operation ':' defined here is opposite to the multiplication operation introduced in[12],[13] and[11]. Consequently, properties which are prefixed with 'left' in the aforementioned papers, become 'right' in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%