2006
DOI: 10.1300/j054v16n01_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Norms Collide: Normative Conflict in the Processing of Public Service Announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Norms can, however, be at odds (Althaus, 2003). Injunctive norms might contradict descriptive norms (Bernthal et al, 2006). For example, Glasser (1992) argued that while diversity is considered a worthy goal in journalism, it can be at odds with the traditional notion of professionalization.…”
Section: Norms and Professionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norms can, however, be at odds (Althaus, 2003). Injunctive norms might contradict descriptive norms (Bernthal et al, 2006). For example, Glasser (1992) argued that while diversity is considered a worthy goal in journalism, it can be at odds with the traditional notion of professionalization.…”
Section: Norms and Professionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recipients are commonly surrounded by people who drive, eat meat regularly and fly whenever it is convenient. Indeed, public service announcements and appeals that convey normative messages to curb problematic behaviors can be undermined by the perception that the relevant behavior is common in domains from health (Bernthal et al, 2006;Staunton et al, 2014), to safety (Cestac et al, 2014), to environmental sustainability (Reynolds-Tylus et al, 2018;Richter et al, 2018).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive effects of compliance with norms have been highlighted in social marketing initiatives, for instance programs aimed to encourage moderation in alcohol consumption (Treise et al , ; Berkowitz, ; Bernthal et al , ; Piacentini and Banister, ; Perkins et al , ), to prevent tobacco use and substance abuse (Berkowitz, ; Perkins, ; Neighbors et al , ), and to enhance environmentally friendly behaviors such as recycling, energy conservation, litter reduction, and the purchase of “green” products (Kahneman, ; Berger and Kanetkar, ; Polonsky, ; Osterhus, ; Thogersen, ; Grankvist et al , ; Goldstein et al , ; Griskevicius et al , ). Conformity to norms has also been showcased in research regarding prosocial consumer behavior, including blood and body‐part donations (Bagozzi, ; LaTour and Manrai, ), and contributions of money or time to worthy causes (Reingen, ; Dawson, ; Fraser et al , ; Yavas et al , ; Sargeant et al , ; Boezeman and Ellemers, ; Fennis et al , ; Fisher et al , ; Liu and Aaker, ; Aaker and Akutsu, ; Garcia et al , ; Winterich et al , ).…”
Section: Social Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%